100% agrees. This was what I was saying a few post back.
This is how the west propoganda machine works. It's never to ban things immediately. It's simply mis-information, part quotes, mis-quotes and last resorts lies.
I mean the BBC is a great example. Whenever the BBC quotes reports from other countries media the British government don't agree with. It always say thinks like "state media. Government mouthpiece" look at the example of the recent Saudi case. They got treated with kids glove. If that was China. They would have thrown the kitchen sink at it.
Another thing is when BBC quotes "state media, government mouthpiece". It does it without any sense irony.
I mean, come on! What dies BBC stand for? British broadcasting cooperation. Paid for by the British taxpayer with appointments by the British government. If that's not the monthpiece of a state media, I don't know what is!
But, of course they keep repeating to their audience how impartial they are. Almost everyday they repeat this. So as the old saying goes. " if a lie gets repeated many times........ you know the rest"
if this ambassador thing was the other way round, and China sack their ambassador. The westen MSM will go overtime in demonising China as authoterian state hell bend on clamping down freedom, descent and liberty. With photos of the 4th June incident thrown in.
And to milk it out as long as possibe. They will get the nobel prize committee readied the Nobel prize for the ambassador in a few years time!
I don't know where to put this post. So I'll attached it to my previous post regarding propoganda and western MSM in general.
So MOD please feel free to move it.
I just recently saw this on TV. Mike Pence giving a press briefing about situation in Venezuela. And in answering what US should do about Venezuela.
He said, and I quote "ALL options are on the table" note the capital for ALL!
Now no one bat an eyelid from that statement? No press condemn that remark!
Mmmm. Is it because of the Monroe doctrine??
Or is it because we have been soften up through the years that if the US decide to invade another country it just another day!
Now let's supposed we change Mike Pence for Xie jinpin. And Venezuela for Taiwan/SCS.
I wonder what the "free press" would say about that. Wait, I wouldn't need to. I already seen it when Xie gave a speech regarding unification, peaceful and reserve the right of force if need be.
The speech was first taken out of context by leaving out the peaceful unification bit! Then reported world wide, and roundly condemned. And put it as another example of authoritarian government wanting to over throw a democratic one. Etc.
Venezuela anyone?
