Ambivalent
Junior Member
Actually, water vapor is really effective at absorbing IR wavelengths. (And least effective in the visual spectrum.) And I would think that especially close to an ocean surface, there is an increased amount of water vapor.
IR seekers are used in BMD because they provide a higher resolution / accuracy then RF seekers due to the shorter wavelength, wich is crucial at the high closing speeds involed. I also don't think that the range of RAM outperforms it's IR sensor.
Yet, I do believe that at least for the close in defense a IR seeker is the best solution, esp. when backed up by passive RF.
I also think a multi sensor approach in attack missiles has it's merits, exploitung the full spectrum. One may not even have to have multiple sensors on one missle, but have many missiles with different seekers and have those missiles communicating with each other.
The trend in the west is to put multiple sensors on each missile, such as one finds on SLAMER and Kongsberg's Naval Strike Missile. The electronics are small enough now to make this practical.
Longer wavelength IR, 8-12 microns, penetrates clouds or haze with greater intensity than visible light. Some supersonic missiles also have such a strong IR plume the IR sensors can often detect them before the ship's radar, while the missile itself is still below the horizon and navies are adopting IRST's on ships to aid detecting these. Still, the missile's own seeker is usually the first clue something is headed your way. A ship's ECM, such as the SLQ-32 will pick up the inbound missile's emissions and cue the RAM to launch. The RF detector is supposed to guide the missile until the IR sensor locks, but RAM can home using IR from launch if the IR plume is sufficient. Block 2 has twice the propellant as previous versions, so a range increase is certain, but there is no open source data. IR is interesting, those dark tinted looking lenses on IR missiles are actually more transparent to IR than clear glass or plastic.