The PLAN is not a blue-water navy. It may have vessels that could carry out blue-water operations, but that's it.
Compared to the US or Japanese navies sure, but compared to most of the rest of Asia's fleets it is a BW force and has conducted round the world cruises.
Generally your list is rather arbitrary.
of course it is, it provides a thumbnail sketch of power rankings not a doctoral thesis.
For example, why does a country have to have a population of 100 million+ to be a superpower?
Population translates into so many other things- workers, engineers, consumers etc.
In the past the UK could be regarded as one and it had a much smaller population.
Global populations were also smaller overall.
Alternatively why 100 million+ and not 200 million+?
because only 3 nations who make the top 3 categories have a population that large.
As to a space programme, what is "credible" and why is it relevant? A lot of people would say space programmes are at best scientific (i.e. not super-power related) and at worse a big international penis-waving competition. When we get to the point where countries can successfully exploit space for real gain, it will be a sign of status. But not before.
Because space programs breed technology, waves the flag, adds economic and political benefits, and finally when the next technological breakthriugh arrives and we boost for orbit, it behooves nations to already have a foot in the door.
Personally I don't think China or Russia are superpowers. Whether the US is a "hyperpower" or a "superpower", it is the only one. Everyone else are at best either potential superpowers or great powers.
Do you not see the overall long term scale of difference between China/Russia and the other "Great Powers"?
Icortez,
Question I would like to ask in relation to the original post is I wasn't aware Brazil was a nuclear power (and some of the others),when did this happen?
The items listed after each state are the items on the super power list the nation is missing.
Spain being added.
Japan is locked into the Great Power list, there is no chance of Japan getting a P5 seat.
Violet Oboe,
Indeed, zraver should not use the term ´nuke power´or ´nuclear force´regarding countries like Japan, Germany and Brazil.
I don't, they are listed as lacking nuclear arsenals.
Obviously all three are capable of mastering the nuclear fuel cycle with Japan even developing a plutonium breeding capacity but Japan, Germany and Brazil have renounced their right for producing nuclear weapons (...though Brazil's legal situation appears not to be as clear as in the case of the two defeated axis powers of WW II). However from a purely technical point of view every state with enough HEU or weapons grade PU (~5 kg Pu, ~15 kg HEU) should be able to produce a crude nuclear device within a couple of months.
If they do then my list will change, right now they haven't. It is also unlikely that they will under their current political climate.