Indian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

zxy_bc

Junior Member
Registered Member
I'd say Israel is pretty potent. Israel is also viewed as an unofficial retail store for US technology so...

Id say India's strategy is quite good. No faults here. But China isn't a stranger to Israel so there's that.
Israeli tech is definitely worthwhile on paper, especially considering its techs relating to US ones. Indian strategy on looking towards Israel is definitely reasonable and rational. However, also because of Israeli tech's close relations with the US ones, it makes me wonder if the US has backdoors in some of the Israeli sold techs.
 

Xizor

Captain
Registered Member
Israeli tech is definitely worthwhile on paper, especially considering its techs relating to US ones. Indian strategy on looking towards Israel is definitely reasonable and rational. However, also because of Israeli tech's close relations with the US ones, it makes me wonder if the US has backdoors in some of the Israeli sold techs.
I don't think so. Well, this is certainly gossip territory but US has repeatedly raised these issues with Israel but if anything, it'd be a slap on the wrist for them.

Most recently, this news :
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I don't think we need to discuss the nature of US/Israel relationship. I don't think it's relevant to this thread. But Israel isn't alone in leaking or pilfering tech. Also, the unique security conditions of Israel forces it to sink considerable capital and Human resource into Defence manufacturing ( often built with US companies) and they have built up a good revenue stream with the sale of these technology.

China's relationship with Israel is not similar to India's of today. China is focused more on civilian technology development (semiconductors, automotive, electronics etc). Increasing US scrutiny on defence technology flow has shifted the nature of cooperation but not stymied the flow.
 

zxy_bc

Junior Member
Registered Member
I don't think so. Well, this is certainly gossip territory but US has repeatedly raised these issues with Israel but if anything, it'd be a slap on the wrist for them.

Most recently, this news :
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I don't think we need to discuss the nature of US/Israel relationship. I don't think it's relevant to this thread. But Israel isn't alone in leaking or pilfering tech. Also, the unique security conditions of Israel forces it to sink considerable capital and Human resource into Defence manufacturing ( often built with US companies) and they have built up a good revenue stream with the sale of these technology.

China's relationship with Israel is not similar to India's of today. China is focused more on civilian technology development (semiconductors, automotive, electronics etc). Increasing US scrutiny on defence technology flow has shifted the nature of cooperation but not stymied the flow.
Ha, interesting news. Indeed peculiar.
 

Xizor

Captain
Registered Member
Kaveri is a failure as of now. The French haven't even helped them with M88.

1. By 2017 ( I don't know the exact dates), the French studied the Kaveri program and helped Indians with reducing engine issues like noise,vibrations etc. Do note that no support was given to improve the core ( High Pressure stages, Turbines) of the engine.

2. Later, Safran promised to support India with Kaveri ( as part of Rafale deal?) on the core but as the Rafale deal got through, Safran came back and told India that it'd offer its M88 core for the Kaveri engine ( Not a tech transfer/ tech infusion but just a replacement of Kaveri core with M88 for a sticker price).

3. Safran is quoting what seems to be a really high price (2 billion and more) for M88 core technology to the indians. I read that this technology itself is outdated ( early M88 with performance similar to what Kaveri sets as goal). And that's not confirmed and could be just wishes and dreams.
Picking this up again, I have posted what i read in other places.

I don't know how Safran will manage to "insert" M88 core into Kaveri (2). Again, this might be just JaiHind reporting. I don't think its possible/ feasible. What they might be suggesting here would be to offer the Manufacturing technology behind the M88 Hot section Turbines for Kaveri core or a license to use the 'process'.

So the (3) third part, if at all it's distinct from the first two, would mean that the Billions French apparently asked India was for transferring the manufacturing Know How to India with increased rights and limited conditions.

Anyway, the most interesting part to be seen isn't all the above but whether India will drop the Kaveri project altogether. To persevere is something Chinese ( circumstances are such that) but India, in present geopolitical climate, wouldn't find it hard to get engine know how if it pleases the right countries enough.

Unless, India tries to do a le Arjun Tank or Tejas here, which would be something else.
 
Last edited:

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Picking this up again, I have posted what i read in other places.

I don't know how Safran will manage to "insert" M88 core into Kaveri (2). Again, this might be just JaiHind reporting. I don't think its possible/ feasible. What they might be suggesting here would be to offer the Manufacturing technology behind the M88 Hot section Turbines for Kaveri core or a license to use the 'process'.

So the (3) third part, if at all it's distinct from the first two, would mean that the Billions French apparently asked India was for transferring the manufacturing Know How to India with increased rights and limited conditions.

Anyway, the most interesting part to be seen isn't all the above but whether India will drop the Kaveri project altogether. To persevere is something Chinese ( circumstances are such that) but India, in present geopolitical climate, wouldn't find it hard to get engine know how if it pleases the right countries enough.

Unless, India tries to do a la Arjun Tank or Tejas here, which would be something else.

If it doesn't fit, you must acquit.
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
Responding to our friend @ougoah who stated that India does not have an ABM/BMD system. Don't worry, I've just finished posting the great advances in the structure of an Indian anti-ballistic system, if that would please you.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Much earlier ones:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Against HGVs:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Programs from 1950s way before India even thought about such things:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Now where is india's supposed BMD ABM?

All these dump posts do is bombard threads with India is also very strong please please believe that India is strong and supa dupa.

None of those posts are relevant. Every single one is unimpressive for even 20th century standards. Let's take a look carefully at each one.
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
India also has dedicated land based radars for space surveillance and tracking.

These radars are known as VLRTR ( very long range tracking radar ). It is a AESA radar using GaN technology.

Their ranges are greater than 3000 km. Though normally they are operated at low power for 2000 km range.

2 units of VLRTR are operational by NTRO which is the technical intelligence agency of India. Though I believe the system’s comes under the purview of Indian defence space agency ( DSA ) and Defence Space Research Agency (DSRA).
.
Just to give an example of the capabilities of older systems operational in India.

In 2015 ISRO ( Indian space research organisation ) commissioned it’s Multi-Object Tracking Radar ( MOTR ) to track its space assets , space debris , reentry of spacecrafts , rocket launches etc.

The radar can detect and track ~ 30 cm x 30 cm sized objects at 800 km range, and ~ 50 cm x 50 cm objects at 1,000 km range in space.

The radar can track more than 10 space targets simultaneously.

View attachment 80252
GaN is preferred if SWaP is at a premium eg airborne radars , otherwise GaAs is mostly opted for due to cost constraints and other complexities. Anyways GaN is the best choice.
.
GaN is preferred if SWaP is at a premium eg airborne radars , otherwise GaAs is mostly opted for due to cost constraints and other complexities. Anyways GaN is the best choice.
View attachment 80253
.
There is another similar ship known as DRDO Project 20 ship / DRDO TDV ( technology demonstration vessel ).

Pic from Jane’s intelligence review magazine
View attachment 80254
.
DRDO Project 20 ship / DRDO TDV (technology demonstration vessel) is fitted with a dual panel long range multifunction radar ( LR-MFR ) which can act as a long range fire control radar.

It also has 4 hatches for installation of ship launch system ( SLS ).

This ship is part of India’s new sea based open test range in the Indian Ocean in order to test long range surface to air missiles , long range cruise missiles , ICBMs / SLBMs , MIRVs / MaRVs / HGVs etc.

View attachment 80256
.
Launch of Dhanush ballistic missile from an Indian Navy OPV ( offshore patrol vessel )

View attachment 80257

Another pic of Dhanush ship launched ballistic missile. It is a version of land launched Prithvi 3 ballistic missile.

The stabilization and launcher mechanism is installed on the OPV helipad.

It is reported armed with nuclear warhead.
View attachment 80258
.
Serves two purpose

1. During peacetime is used to fire dhanush to stimulate hostile ballistic missile in order to test Indian BMD interceptors.

2. During wartime if required take out the hostile naval base on the western side.

Serves two purpose

1. During peacetime is used to fire dhanush to stimulate hostile ballistic missile in order to test Indian BMD interceptors.

2. During wartime if required take out the hostile naval base on the western side.
.
This is the ship launch system ( SLS ) launcher for the floating test range which is fitted to DRDO project 20 / TDV ship.

View attachment 80259
.
View attachment 80260
.
Old satellite pic of INS Dhruv during its construction showing the various radomes on the ship


View attachment 80261
.
In other news Indian Navy and Indian coast guard variant of Dhruv Mk3 inducted in service.

View attachment 80262
.
Pic coast guard variant


View attachment 80264

Helicopters purchased from others well who doesn't have those. Dhruv is quite possibly the absolute worst helicopter to have been made by man. It is the most accident prone, the lowest in service, the only one to have been returned and refunded.
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
2021-12-24 12_52_26-File_Yuanwang 1 in Shanghai, 2019-10-17.jpg - Wikipedia — Mozilla Firefox.jpg


Yuan Wang 1 that entered service in 1977 and retired in 2010.

China is up to Yuan Wang 21 and 22. India is roughly 40 years behind. Still India has no deep space network of its own and goes begging to other powers to borrow their expertise and deep space networks for space missions that require them.

Big woop these dump posts of India supa dupa and still at least 40 years behind even China. India's radars are made up of foreign AESA modules and technology. The vast majority of India's radar units are actually REBRANDED Israeli ones. 1:1 the same in some cases and often even made in Israel instead of India with license production. Has India exported a single radar unit or air defence system? Nope. China has been selling them since the 1990s and won competitions against Russian and American systems.

Let's see India build something similar to Type 346, not even 346A or 346B.

Or see India build a ship of this class to fit electronics and radar equipment that even starts to approach China's 1990s level.

1640311074446.png

Haldilal I appreciate respectable responses but please don't pretend India is even close to 20 years behind China in these fields. It's not even got a real electronics or radar industry or a shipbuilding industry that is 10% of China's. India accounts for barely single digit global ship building and China is the ship builder of the world alongside South Korea.

Stop dumping post after post of what India has. If you did that, even filling posts with Israeli purchased stuff, it would be over in a few pages. If we did that with Chinese equipment, it would take dozens of pages.
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
Launch of Dhanush ballistic missile from an Indian Navy OPV ( offshore patrol vessel )

View attachment 80257

lol

At sea launches like that Indian dhanush is such a pointless thing. One missile on a boat? Post when India has the ability to launch IRBM or ICBM ranged missiles from submarines in numbers. Ask why no major military country does an Indian dhanush. For space launch at sea it would be something like this.

1640311386516.png

1640311552470.png

1640311561656.png

Real payloads for real missions and real progress. Not India's "Look at me! I launched 100+ "micro satellites" aka plastic calculator sized objects that do absolutely nothing at all" vs everyone else's micro satellites that are part of projects with function. India launched plastic bricks into orbit and called it microsatellites but China's are part of space missions and each one perform actual tasks.

As for military payloads, no major military country requires an entire ship to launch one single short ranged ballistic missile. That is pathetically bad and a poor use of limited resources. India has how many ships that launch prithvi? Fewer than China has Type 094 and each Type 094 can launch 12 JL-2 which are five times longer in range than Prithvi. This is already a second rate thing for China with Type 094B and JL-3 or Type 096 and various long ranged surface to surface.

What Dhanush system is is basically a frigate sized ship with a V-2 on the back. To show that off... unbelievable.
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
1640312000710.png

2021-12-24 13_15_24-agni v missile - Google Search — Mozilla Firefox.jpg

These are pretty rubbish missiles for 21st century standards.

India has yet to develop a single ICBM. China managed to do that in the 1970s and on their third generation of long ranged ICBM and SLBM now with MaRV being much more mature, MIRV being a common thing for a while now, and HGVs.

The gap between India and Chinese radars and missiles is like the gap between Tejas and J-20. Decades and hundreds of industries and mastery of fields that India has not even begun establishing let alone actually working within.
 
Top