USA brought China into WTO hoping they can get rich off China like they stole entire native land & other countries oil, other resources. Don't whine that someone schooled your little master on their own game without colonization. Besides the so called successful Indians always become successful when they leave the British left over colony. It must be very painful for you helplessly watching someone smashing your Western master's...should I say azz? Or rules based order as you like to call it?
USA didn't bring China into shit. Nobody ever signed an international law where it said WTO was America's organization. China entered WTO because it wanted to, due to having a large government sector that could be transformed into a large civilian gdp.
If China didn't enter WTO they could make their own WTO.
The problem of indians is that they do not understand the need to invest in the fundamental sciences.
When China exited the cold war, they had due to persistent state driven research already every foundational technology. These just needed to be transferred to the civilian sector.
As an example, China started it's 5th generation program in the 1990s, before it ever "opened up", so where would it have stolen any technology when it didn't have any connection with the west at all? America claims stolen tech yet WTO never ruled a single time in their favor of those claims. Claims of theft that don't hold up in court are called libel.
If it was so easy to steal tech then why did only ever a singular country succeed with it? How come India despite inheriting so much from the British were unable to steal even a basic amount of tech?
In reality American claims are based of nazist white solidarity principles where they think a "white" invention such as trains or cars are the exclusive property of white nations or something. Obviously this is not international law. China didn't steal tech more than Germany stole any tech by making their own designs of trains and tanks despite British originally inventing those.
@Overlord unless you have any legal proof whatsoever of such psuedo factual nonsense, you should delete the post, given that it is about as factual as ww2 myths about Jews eating babies.