How China Could Replace all US Technology

Status
Not open for further replies.

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
China's shale oil reserves are concentrated in the south-west region which is prone to earth quake, we all remember the devastation of Sichuan earthquake in 2008. We don't know if continuously pumping water into mountains will cause or trigger earthquake, but even triggering landslide would be dangerous to road and river valleys.

China should never do it for the sake of future generations.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
This is obliquely related to the trade war. Since the trade war thread is in lock-down, I have to put it here. In essence, the implication of this news is that there is only a slime chance that the U.S. could form a coalition with EU to fight a trade war against China. Not only that, it seems that the Trump administration now has to fight a two-front war at the critical juncture of Trump-Xi meeting. Emphasis is added by me.



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
In deed, INSTEX as it is called, is more than facilitating EU/Iran trade, it is a replacement of SWIFT just like the Chinese CIPS. It serves to de-coupling EU from dollar dominated trading system, replacing dollar with Euro and weakening American's financial power. By doing so, decoupling US politic dominance.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
In deed, INSTEX as it is called, is more than facilitating EU/Iran trade, it is a replacement of SWIFT just like the Chinese CIPS. It serves to de-coupling EU from dollar dominated trading system, replacing dollar with Euro and weakening American's financial power. By doing so, decoupling US politic dominance.

INSTEX is more a workaround, as it lets companies barter trade, with no currency movements between Europe and Iran.

The key question is if oil starts being traded, which requires the EU to protect companies against US threats.

Otherwise it's useless from the Iranian point of view.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
INSTEX is more a workaround, as it lets companies barter trade, with no currency movements between Europe and Iran.

The key question is if oil starts being traded, which requires the EU to protect companies against US threats.

Otherwise it's useless from the Iranian point of view.
nowadays, there is no cash moving around be it Euro or Dollar, all it happens is a number of the account of party A being reduced by the same amount raised in party B's account in the same institution be it a bank or INSTEX. Currency is just a measurement of the trade. The numbers' deduction and addition is movement of value, calling it currency or virtual currency doesn't make a difference. Similar things like SDR (special drawing right) is just another example.

As whether oil trade will be traded, INSTEX can act as the medium. INSTEX is designed to facilitate trade in line with JCPOA, whatever items that may be. If oil trade is part of JCPOA, then oil trade will be done through INSTEX. Remember, EU has made it a law to forbid EU companies to comply with US' extra sanction. It all depends on EU's determination to hold up to JCPOA.

Nothing will make big change overnight, it starts small and grow big, INSTEX is the first step just like Euro in its inception decades ago.
 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Shale oil is basically a scam. Yes it produces a ton of oil, but it is extremely capital intensive, to the point it will cost more to drill and produce than the oil is worth. But companies also can't just walk away because they need to have cash flow. So it's either build more debt and a slow death or walk away with smaller debt now. If you want to look at private corporate debt, no Chinese company can even approach the likes of shale oil companies.

O ya and it's terrible for creating earth quakes and contaminating ground water.

I hope China doesn't go down that route even when desperate

It is a scam indeed. From what I heard you need to put in 1 unit of energy in to get 2 units out.
In older oil explorations you put it 1 unit of energy and got more than 20 units of energy out.
You use lots of water, it pollutes the ground like heck, and induces earthquakes.
Most of the output is natgas, or other light volatiles, rather than oil, which are low density and need to the piped or liquefied. Even more expense.
Because of this natgas is often sold at negative price (you read that right) so it is simply flared and wasted away.
The oil wells last like a year or two before running out then you need to drill again elsewhere.
This wastes huge amounts of money and its only valued because in the current market there are several applications where it is hard to replace oil.

China is better off investing in electric vehicles I think. It also will help with inner city pollution.
They are already good enough in the mid range and high end range car sectors or in city buses.
Once solid-state batteries come out, with even better safety, less costs, and more density, it will only hasten the transition to electrics.

There is so much cheap gas elsewhere in Asia that China can basically use that to power a large part of the long range fleet as well if it comes to that.
Reducing the need for oil in the first place will mean China will become less sensitive to shocks in price.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

An offer China can't refuse: 'Godfather of Taiwan's DRAM industry' to lead new Tsinghua Unigroup memory unit
Another step towards self-reliance amid US trade tiff
By
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
1 Jul 2019 at 17:00

China-owned semiconductor giant Tsinghua Unigroup, which already manufactures flash memory, is about to try its luck at making DRAM – a much more complicated endeavour.

According to DRAMeXchange, Tsinghua's new DRAM unit will be led by Charles Kao as CEO, and Diao Shijing, former director of the Electronic Information Department of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, as chair.

Kao has been
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
"the godfather" of Taiwan's DRAM industry. He is the chairman of Inotera Memories, acting chairman of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and former president of Nanya – all three make DRAM products.

DRAMeXchange claimed Tsinghua has experience building production facilities as it employs the same teams that worked on fabs for Yangtze Memory. Tsinghua is already building a DRAM plant in Nanjing and is negotiating with the government of Chongqing, where it hopes to open a second facility.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top