Hong-Kong Protests
- Thread starter Pika
- Start date
It is no surprise that the citizens of USA and other western nations still support the Hong Kong protest, because it is bombarded with propaganda like this!
So it is still peaceful in Nancy's head! And I supposed she believe USA is not meddling! just think what would happen if China is doing what USA is doing in Hong kong right now!
either!
So it is still peaceful in Nancy's head! And I supposed she believe USA is not meddling! just think what would happen if China is doing what USA is doing in Hong kong right now!
either!
No. I am merely noting what is actually happening in Hong Kong, in spite of your voluble, desperate attempts to drown it out.
Beijing is doing what I prefer.
Beijing is NOT doing what YOU prefer. By recommending a violent response from the central government to the riots, you are actually falling into the rioters' trap. Perhaps you secretly support them.
By avoiding the trap, I am doing far better than you.
Presumably you mean me.
Notice that my suggestion was to cut the Hong Kong water supply down to where everybody can still live, but where showers are impossible. Making people stink is far, far better than invading the island and killing them. People who suggest that I want to kill anyone are not telling the truth.
LOL, that would really improve their market share in China.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
I'm DESPERATELY trying to make you understand English LOL. Perhaps you need this conversation in Chinese to understand, because every post of yours is not an answer to mine, but a copy of your last post which was already rebutted into the ground many times...
They're not doing what you prefer OR what I want to see; they're doing what they're doing in secrecy. The only thing that you said Beijing is up to is timidly waiting for "encouragement" from pro-Beijing protests in Hong Kong in order to protect its patriots, which is obviously wrong because they've gotten it and they haven't done anything visible.
Yeah, I secretly support them because I want the rioters/terrorists and just the rioters/terrorists dead so they can finally be reincarnated into good upstanding citizens, patriots even! I support that.
You on the other hand, think everybody should just not take showers, and that's not now, but in the face of an actual secession, Beijing should just stop everyone from taking showers! It gets stupider every time one thinks about it.
I think I'll just quote my last one again since you can't ever actually rebut a point... From 2369:
"Yeah, you're calling for a policy that attacks every person in Hong Kong patriots and terrorists all the same and you think you're not falling into the rioter's trap. You've really showing everyone that stupid people don't know they're stupid. You need to check the amount of support on their comments to know if they're making sense."
Presumably, you can't read. His quote said nothing about killing people; it was NO punitive measures against ALL of Hong Kong. Deprivation of even shower water is a punitive measure that law-abiding citizens and patriots will have to suffer for no crime that they have committed. Reading comprehension is required.
PS. Still, 2 points that you continuously avoid because you obviously cannot find a way to twist them to be anything other than total failures caused by your ignorance:
1. You said Beijing should deprive Hong Kong of water in case of a secession. There is no secession and there is no talk about water deprivation. You made it up, it's stupid, no one backs it, and the situation is still totally irrelevant. You lose.
2. You said that Chinese patriots in Hong Kong don't deserve Beijing's consideration because they have not protested en masse, which is your theory on why Beijing has not intervened to protect them. It was shown that you have this sentiment because you were ignorant of the current events and did not even know that they already have done what you accused them of not doing... yet Beijing has still not intervened. Thus, your theory is not only ill-informed, but impossible to be correct since it does not even match known facts. You lose again.
Last edited:
Regardless of what you say, the ACTUAL situation in Hong Kong, and the ACTUAL moves of Beijing, are much closer to what I want (peaceful resolution) than what you want (violent suppression). You are desperately attempting to drown out the uncomfortable truth.
By being far closer to reality than you, I'm winning.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
OK, everything you said is wrong and I'm just going to tell you to go ahead and address the points already here because you missed all of them again: https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/hong-kong-protests.t8580/page-238#post-575702
You couldn't even quote the whole thing because you want to pretend that those points don't exist. There's no point for me to write the same things to you yet again all because you cannot answer anything that I say but only pretend to win arguments that aren't there. You know, I know and everybody on this forum knows you can't hope to win against me. I'm the guy who's known for taking out Western fanboys who ran their yaps on and on for years before arguing with me and disappearing from the forum. You're known for repeating, "I win; you lose" like a kid at the special Olympics that his dad made for him in his own back yard.
Last edited: