heads up: New amphibious ship

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
bd popeye said:
Or are you refering to the design in this link below? Actually that ship looks like an LPD to me.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Looks very similar to the US San Antonio design, without the composite, stealthy main masts.

sanantonio6.jpg


sanantonio4.jpg
 

MIGleader

Banned Idiot
vessel52206h4lb.jpg

If you take a look at this pic swimmer posted in the picture thread, it seems like china already has a few of these landing ships.

so the ship we see is not a new build after all, but a follow on of what appears to be new model of small landing ship. Perhaps the successor to the type 271.
 

planeman

Senior Member
VIP Professional
Great photo! That puts it into perspective, it is much smaller than it looked in the first photo. It looks like it can only hold 5 MBTs or trucks.
 
tphuang said:
you know, looking at what IDont just posted, I think China would be doing pretty well if it can just somehow assemble a couple of Expedition strike groups. It would be a lot easier to accomplish than a full fledging CVBG. China can get some training with this and it would be a lot smaller jump to go from this to a real carrier group.

It would be a much wiser investment for China to construct some LPH or LHDs before it tries for a full fledged aircraft carrier.

These boats displace and cost less than full fledged carriers yet they would involve a lot of similar technologies as carriers that China can experiment with on a smaller cheaper scale.

It would spur helicopter purchases and development which appears to be lagging behind that of fixed wing aircraft. And with the diverse geography that China must deal with and the importance of logistical and humanitarian missions, increased investment in helicopter development makes sense, as well as having LPHs or LPDs handy.

Politically LPHs and LPDs are also less threatening and alarming than carriers as they do not posses the same offensive capability.

On the other hand, in strict terms of offensive power these boats would contribute little in a Taiwan scenario. However in the later stages of a PLA assault that successfully guarantees some safety for these ships their helicopters could be used for quick reinforcement, clean up, psychological warfare, or support operations especially in the less accessible areas.

This is actually a critical capability that China otherwise would lack. Because in the event of conflict PLA forces already in the Taiwan theatre would already be stretched and taken casualties while LPHs or LPDs could initially be held in reserve and relative safety outside the theatre and moved in quickly after some measure of naval or air superiority can be guaranteed.
 

IDonT

Senior Member
VIP Professional
tphuang said:
you know, looking at what IDont just posted, I think China would be doing pretty well if it can just somehow assemble a couple of Expedition strike groups. It would be a lot easier to accomplish than a full fledging CVBG. China can get some training with this and it would be a lot smaller jump to go from this to a real carrier group.

Certainly doable!
South Korea and Japan already has the capability to form an "expeditionary strike group".

Dokdo Ham
capt.sel80105230059.south_korea_landing_ship_sel801.jpg
 
Top