I am surprised that this didn't get more attention at the time tbh, including on behalf of myself.
Like... It's rather consequential that we confirm that H-6K is compatible with YJ-12, because it potentially means that all 100 odd H-6Ks produced are capable of carrying YJ-12s, in addition to the two units of H-6Js identifies which probably amount to some 20 H-6Js right now.
There's 4 H-6N serials identified, meaning the actual number of H-6N is probably more like 10 right now, and it should have compatibility with the same weapons as K and J.
... In other words, there's probably something like
130-140 H-6K/J/N that are compatible with YJ-12s, rather than just the 20 odd H-6Js alone.
I feel like this is sort of a rather significant development, almost amounting to a game changer in terms of magnitude of high end airborne anti shipping capability.
I mean, I only recounted this because I was just writing a piece about the H-6K family today WANs was reviewing recent pictures and news...
But potentially up to 130-140 YJ-12 compatible H-6K/J/Ns is... Rather consequential.
That's 4 YJ-12s per aircraft (maybe 6, we have yet to get confirmation if they can or cannot carry YJ-12s on the outer weapons pylons).
Even if not all H-6K is used in the anti ship role, having that multirole flexibility if the mission demands it, and being able to take the anti ship mission of an H-6J if any of the latter are lost or require augmentation, is a bit of a big development.
===
Like, there was earlier images in April this year as well confirming this... did I miss a big "omg" moment, or was there just none that happened?