it's possible that they could got for WS-15.Speaking of the engines, and assuming that the H-XX is indeed powered by 4 high-thrust low/medium-bypass non-afterburning (AB) turbofan engines in similar flying wing configurations as the B-2:
Even better would be if (or hopefully, when) the H-XX has the non-AB variant of WS-10 swapped with the non-AB variant of WS-15 upon entering serial production stages.
Let's say that the WS-15 has the same performance parameters as the F119 that powers the F-22, which means a military/dry thrust of around 105-110KN. That would equal to about 420-440kN of thrust from having four of them onboard.
In retrospect, the F118s on the B-2 (which is the non-afterburning variant of the F110) has a thrust of 77-85kN each, meaning a combined thrust of 308-340kN.
Needless to say, the H-XX could indeed be quite larger and have considerably heavier MTOW (200+ tons) than even the B-2.
Apart from what you've mentioned (power generation, radar, EW, computing systems etc), that also means a much larger internal volume for bigger/more fuel tanks (meaning greater ranges and loitering durations in the theater of war), plus longer and deeper (main) IWBs for carrying large ballistic/hypersonic missiles with strike ranges of around 2000-4000 kilometers.
Might even open the possibility of deriving a stealth tanker variant from the original combat variant of the H-XX, though that's still somewhat on the hypothetical side of things.
Although, I would argue it's better if they can develop a non-afterburner version of WS-10 that's just more fuel efficient. They could get something that generates maybe 90kN each or 360kN in total that can do much longer combat radius (think 4500 to 5000 km).
Basically if you can get carrier group out to maybe East of Guam and then refuel H-20 about 3500 to 4000 km from Hawaii, then you can hit the fleet stationed around Pearl Harbour with stand off missiles. I guess you can also get it to carry smaller hypersonic missiles in IWB, but some of the fire power from these long range platforms are not just from themselves or the CCAs, but also the ground and naval launched hypersonic missiles. Once you get those hypersonic aerial vehicles into service, you can get them to launch hypersonic munitions (based on gliding + motor) that will be very hard to intercept.
A large part of H-20 will be its EW capability, so I place less premium on what it can carry, but more on how it affects adversary defense.
As for tankers, I think if you are going to do stealth tanker, it's expected then to operate from contested air space, then you need to make it carrier capable. Otherwise, why not just use YY-20A? Are you going to really fly a H-20 sized tanker 4000 km out to refuel? that takes so much time and uses a lot of fuel