Engineer
Major
A model with underside intakes is much more believable in my opinion.Interesting that this CGI shows underside intakes, where the model clearly depicts upper.
A model with underside intakes is much more believable in my opinion.Interesting that this CGI shows underside intakes, where the model clearly depicts upper.
My understanding is as follow; JH-XX and H-18 will compliment MRBM in being able to strike anywhere within the second island chain. Hypersonic gliders will replace traditional warheads on top of ballistic missiles.#1) base on the assumption above, ... ...
In what ways does the mission purpose of JH-XX or H-18 differ from Hypersonic UAV drone ?
No. The story goes, and has been going for the past few years, is that China think tanks expect a high probability of a military conflict from 2017 and onward. So, military projects have a deadline before that time. Hence, as that date moves closer, more and more projects come to fruition.#2) IMHO, the faster rate of Technological Breakthrough in China could well be significantly caused by Anti Corruption program.
Many thanks for sharing your feedback.
Firstly, my knowledge on military equipments are extremely pedestrian.
My own understanding is ... ... ( using Abundance mindset practise by China leadership -- not Scarcity ( zero-sum ) mindset practise by you-know-who )
At least for the moment, in order to avoid future nuclear exchange between China and you-know-who, both JH-XX and Hypersonic UAV will be use to show the (you-know-who-leaders) that China can deliver conventional payload to any you-know-who city at ease.
The purpose is not to show-off that China can, but to make you-know-who back down and stop confronting and stop harassing China at every opportunity it gets.
So China can go about her own business of achieving more and more economic prosperity for all nations, and explore the outer space ( Moon, Mars, and so on ).
----------------------------------------------------------
#1) base on the assumption above, ... ...
In what ways does the mission purpose of JH-XX or H-18 differ from Hypersonic UAV drone ?
#2) IMHO, the faster rate of Technological Breakthrough in China could well be significantly caused by Anti Corruption program.
Because, competent and top performing scientists are in charge of the main project and subproject now. The inferior performing scientists / inferior leaders who are around because of their personal connection are demoted and no longer has much sway to block the progress of competent and top performing scientists.
#3) Competent and top performing scientists who no longer have the MENTAL burden of being blocked or hindered by inferior performing scientists / inferior leaders, get energized by this new cleaner ( much less corruption ) working environment.
The combined efforts of these top performing scientists energies
create a buzz of synergistic technological breakthrough, where ( 1 scientist +1 scientist ) =/= 2 scientists, but ... ...
Now, the new cleaner working environment ( much less corruption ) formula is ... ...
( 1 scientist * knowhow +1 scientist * knowhow ) = 11 scientists * knowhow
I'm also no expert on military equipments as most guys in this forum are more knowledgeable than me. But JH-XX or H-18's estimated combat radius is around 3000KM-3500KM that means it can only reach around the second island chain, Japan, South China sea and Guam at the most. The distance between China and U.S mainland is 11,000 km plus!
A model with underside intakes is much more believable in my opinion.
Interesting that this CGI shows underside intakes, where the model clearly depicts upper.
Anyway, getting posted on Huitong's site is definitely one step closer to credibility for this plane... I remember a year or two back H-18 was posted on there as well, and we were all burned by PSed pictures which didn't even look anything remotely like the black model we saw.
Hopefully things will be different this time around.
A part of me just wants SAC to build a prototype and fly it, I don't even necessarily care too much about it entering service at this point, I'd just like to see what this looks like in real life. I feel like its design has the potential to be one of the "greats" in recent military aviation.
Take offs, and especially landings are high-alpha maneuvers. They may not be as high as 9-G maneuvuers, but still high enough where dorsal intakes may be problematic. Also, JH-XX implies a fighter-bomber, so there still need to be some requirements for maneuverability.How so? It is a bomber primarily, after all, it won't have to conduct any high alpha maneuvers, I imagine there should be very little disruption of airflow to its air intake during level flight.
Take offs, and especially landings are high-alpha maneuvers. They may not be as high as 9-G maneuvuers, but still high enough where dorsal intakes may be problematic. Also, JH-XX implies a fighter-bomber, so there still need to be some requirements for maneuverability.
2500 km is a huge figure. f111 managed 1750 km radius on 16 tons of fuel (all internal) carrying 10 tons of bombs and flying high and at cruise speed all the way.
adding a third more fuel (external tanks) and carrying 4 tons of bombs should be able to stretch it to 2500 km. (two 1 ton bombs internal, two external) but again that's cruise speed all the way, and we're talking about a plane that while good for comparison as it has internal weapon bay, is still smaller than what is expected for jh-xx.
Something with larger weapon bays should suffer in performance a bit, and suffer more so due to low rcs requirements. So, talking about a cruise speed all the way mission - a 50-60 ton mtow plane might do 2500 km carrying 2 large-ish missiles internally. to do a few hundred long dash at, say, mach 1.6 - that is going to drop to under 2000 km.
Unless we're talking about something thats closer to h-6 in weight class, a 70+ ton mtow plane.