Task & Purpose is bottom-of-the-barrel nonsense. Damn. I waited so long to make this comment somewhere.Bro he literally said j20 had a rcs of 0.5m^2 to 3m^2. What does J-20 have anti-stealth technology for it to achieve 3m^2
Task & Purpose is bottom-of-the-barrel nonsense. Damn. I waited so long to make this comment somewhere.Bro he literally said j20 had a rcs of 0.5m^2 to 3m^2. What does J-20 have anti-stealth technology for it to achieve 3m^2
He should stick to his original content of gun reviews and more infantry related things because that's his element, whenever he talks about other things, it sounds like he does only 5 minutes of research before he writes his scripts, prime misinformation. Under the guise of his "Honest" appearance he manages to mislead millions of viewers. He's obviously very honestly stupid.Task & Purpose is bottom-of-the-barrel nonsense. Damn. I waited so long to make this comment somewhere.
It's obviously on purpose, and that he has an agenda of promoting US and basically being a mouthpiece.He should stick to his original content of gun reviews and more infantry related things because that's his element, whenever he talks about other things, it sounds like he does only 5 minutes of research before he writes his scripts, prime misinformation. Under the guise of his "Honest" appearance he manages to mislead millions of viewers. He's obviously very honestly stupid.
Those engine inlets seem to be big enough for only one engine on either side.View attachment 109472
Seems coming out from some sort of patent application?
If those engines would be WS-15s without the afterburner, two would be sufficient. However, if H-20 still uses WS-10 (without afterburner), maybe 4 would be necessary. However, as two WS-15 equipped H-20 would be somewhat similar in size with B-21 as opposed to the B-2. At the same time, it is totally possible that this picture is not accurate, and a super H-20 would have four WS-15s with a wingspan of 50-60 meters (payload of 45 tons). In that case, it would be the most powerful intercontinental bomber ever created.Those engine inlets seem to be big enough for only one engine on either side.
this would be really interesting. i mean have you heard something related super H-20 from your source. ?a super H-20 would have four WS-15s with a wingspan of 50-60 meters (payload of 45 tons). In that case, it would be the most powerful intercontinental bomber ever created.
If those engines would be WS-15s without the afterburner, two would be sufficient. However, if H-20 still uses WS-10 (without afterburner), maybe 4 would be necessary. However, as two WS-15 equipped H-20 would be somewhat similar in size with B-21 as opposed to the B-2. At the same time, it is totally possible that this picture is not accurate, and a super H-20 would have four WS-15s with a wingspan of 50-60 meters (payload of 45 tons). In that case, it would be the most powerful intercontinental bomber ever created.