Germany Carl Zeiss, heart of Dutch ASML Lithography Equipment.

Status
Not open for further replies.
manqiangrexue

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
navip635 said:
Don't really want to post it here, it will be my last.

Intelligence report submitted to White House
Bloomberg cites three US officials who have seen the classified report. It says that China's reporting on the scale of the virus was intentionally incomplete and concludes the numbers were fake.

The huge numbers of urns in pictures last weeks and long lines of people waiting to collect remains led just about everyone to conclude the same thing last week:
China

We were
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in early February on the strong evidence that crematoriums in Wuhan were running flat-out.

The issue is that many other countries relied in Chinese data to make determinations about how to handle the virus. The numbers were also used in models predicting the spread.

That said, everyone has known for 20 years that you can't trust Chinese data so people and governments who were trusting the data really only have themselves to blame.

More important than this
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
is news today that China locked down an area of 600,000 people on signs of a new outbreak.

We are on the same page but read the word "intentionally" they are pushing for certain nefarious narrative aided by their vassals, ultimately to label PRC as a pariah state and demand seek compensation, reparation.
Click to expand...
If you don't wanna post it here, then why'd you post it here? It was already discussed and rebutted here:

Coronavirus 2019-2020 thread (no unsubstantiated rumours!)

I always knew China was under-reporting their COVID-19 numbers. It seems they really under reported with 3000+ deaths. 45,000 cremated remains to handed back to families in Wuhan alone. Of course not all was due to the virus, but a large amount probably was. Many here will dismiss this as...
www.sinodefenceforum.com

It doesn't matter what a newspaper or its reporters want to do; the world said no and it is still saying no. Why are you posting these things like we should assume that this is the direction of all Western countries? You cannot override the big picture with details of the ridiculous ambitions of small groups of people.
 
T

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
Huawei's tone is changing.
Last yr, when facing US sanction, it boasted it doesn't need US chips, it has backup.

But now facing TSMC being cut off, it uses the words like lament and that Chinese government won't be idle while it's on the chopping block.

It finally shows it can't defend itself.

A few years ago, I sent them a message of the need to go IDM and invest in new Semiconductor manufacturing tech like EUV, but they didn't bother and now they have to pay for their inactions.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
manqiangrexue

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
tidalwave said:
It finally shows it can't defend itself.

A few years ago, I sent them a message of the need to go IDM and invest in new Semiconductor manufacturing tech like EUV, but they didn't bother and now they have to pay for their inactions.
Click to expand...
That's your guess based on the type of speech used in a news article? LOL

I'll believe Huawei's in trouble when their products can't roll out anymore.
 
T

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
manqiangrexue said:
That's your guess based on the type of speech used in a news article? LOL

I'll believe Huawei's in trouble when their products can't roll out anymore.
Click to expand...
I know more than you in this field nuff said. I am not going to argue with your weird logic.

You sound exactly like the Chinese guy named engineer in here using all kinds of argument why China wont buy su35. But now I hardly see him anymore. Are you him? You sound like him.
 
manqiangrexue

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
tidalwave said:
I know more than you in this field nuff said.
Click to expand...
Who knows? There's not a second semiconductor guy here to check your knowledge. Even if you do, it means nothing; I'm a geneticist. Knowing more about semiconductors than a geneticist does not qualify anyone to make claims about the future of Huawei. Million dollar question is, do you know more about this field than Huawei's engineers? If not, that's probably why they ignored you.

tidalwave said:
I am not going to argue with your weird logic.
Click to expand...
Yeah, my logic is really weird. When someone claims that Huawei's in trouble, I actually want to see numbers or issues with their products as evidence. How weird! Normal/regular logic would be to just read a news article, attempt to extrapolate a conclusion from the perceived tone/diction, and present that conclusion as truth/fact.
 
Last edited:
T

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
manqiangrexue said:
Who knows? There's not a second semiconductor guy here to check your knowledge. Even if you do, it means nothing; I'm a geneticist. Knowing more about semiconductors than a geneticist does not qualify anyone to make claims about the future of Huawei. Million dollar question is, do you know more about this field than Huawei's engineers? If not, that's probably why they ignored you.


Yeah, my logic is really weird. When someone claims that Huawei's in trouble, I actually want to see numbers or issues with their products as evidence. How weird! Normal/regular logic would be to just read a news article, attempt to extrapolate a conclusion from the perceived tone/diction, and present that conclusion as truth/fact.
Click to expand...


Instead of praising you for your patriotism of huawei you actually doing a disservice to them for covering their weakness which you have no clues about.
That's all that's to it.
 
manqiangrexue

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
tidalwave said:
Instead of praising you for your patriotism of huawei you actually doing a disservice to them for covering their weakness which you have no clues about.
That's all that's to it.
Click to expand...
Instead of whom praising me? LOL For asking for evidence beyond your interpretation of the tone of a news article? There is nothing that goes on in this forum that could affect Huawei in any way so don't worry about it.

You have no valuable expertise in your field to offer Huawei and you're bothering them with your useless emails (which they put into the spam folder by sender ID) as they use real engineers to tackle the problem. That's all there is to it.

tidalwave said:
You sound exactly like the Chinese guy named engineer in here using all kinds of argument why China wont buy su35. But now I hardly see him anymore. Are you him? You sound like him.
Click to expand...
I just saw this. That's an interesting accusation from someone who has several previously banned IDs. Engineer and I were posting at the same time with very significant overlap and you wonder if I'm him? That's the type of logical reasoning that makes people certain that you can't be useful to a company like Huawei.

And to be perfectly clear, I don't know anything about semiconductors so I'm not arguing about them with you or anybody. I simply asked for your evidence that Huawei is in trouble in the form of numbers coming from the company or its inability to continue production. I can't say if your claim is right or wrong but I simply asked for evidence, and your response is that you know more about the field than a geneticist. Now that's weird logic...
 
Last edited:
A

antiterror13

Brigadier
tidalwave said:
I know more than you in this field nuff said. I am not going to argue with your weird logic.

You sound exactly like the Chinese guy named engineer in here using all kinds of argument why China wont buy su35. But now I hardly see him anymore. Are you him? You sound like him.
Click to expand...

thats quite arrogant statement .... how do you know?

That kind of arrogant statements we won't hear from top engineers or scientists .. and you are definitely not one of those

Are you desperate to be hired by Huawei ... or Huawei desperate to hire you? I'd bet my $$$ that the latter won't be the case at all
 
T

tidalwave

Senior Member
Registered Member
Antiterror, I am gonna ignore your silly , unprofesaional statements.
And also I am not argue with anyone who's trying to argue for the sake of argument without the necessay technical knowledge.it's a waste of time!

Looking back. Huawei has the best chance of starting the IDM fab business in 2009, the last economic crisia So many Semiconductor companies folded at the time , tons of fab engineers available on the market. Huawei missed the chance on that one. It's like not like now where Chinese companies have to overbid taiwnawse and Korean engineers 5or 6 times the salary to draw them to China . Had they even attempted that, they would be much better on control of their destiny now.

Huawei is hoping and praying US government won't go down this route this time
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top