I noticed that Greta has been sliding towards the left. I shall watch her radicalization with great interest.View attachment 120375
View attachment 120376
Guess this is end for Greta, we won't be seeing her getting hyped up again
View attachment 120523
Hong Kong cockroach brutally beaten by Tibetan villager for insulting the Chairman Mao portrait on display in their house.
View attachment 120523
Hong Kong cockroach brutally beaten by Tibetan villager for insulting the Chairman Mao portrait on display in their house.
In the morning I inspected my traveling companions and found a youth and a handsome old man with a wisp of gray beard sitting opposite me, sipping bitter tea. Presently the youth spoke to me, in formalities at first, and then inevitably of politics. I discovered that his wife’s uncle was a railway official and that he was traveling with a pass. He was on his way back to Szechuan, his native province, which he had left seven years before. But he was not sure that he would be able to visit his home town after all. Bandits were reported to be operating near there.
“You mean Reds?”
“Oh, no, not Reds, although there are Reds in Szechuan, too. No, I mean bandits.”
“But aren’t the Reds also bandits?” I asked out of curiosity. “The newspapers always call them Red bandits or Communist bandits.”
“Ah, but you must know that the editors must call them bandits because they are ordered to do so by Nanking,” he explained. “If they called them Communists or revolutionaries that would prove they were Communists themselves.”
“But in Szechuan don’t people fear the Reds as much as the bandits?”
“Well, that depends. The rich men fear them, and the landlords, and the officials and tax collectors, yes. But the peasants do not fear them. Sometimes they welcome them.” Then he glanced apprehensively at the old man, who sat listening intently, and yet seeming not to listen. “You see,” he continued, “the peasants are too ignorant to understand that the Reds only want to use them. They think the Reds really mean what they say.”
“But they don’t mean it?”
“My father wrote to me that they did abolish usury and opium in the Sungpan [Szechuan], and that they redistributed the land there. So you see they are not exactly bandits. They have principles, all right. But they are wicked men. They kill too many people.”
Then surprisingly the greybeard lifted his gentle face and with perfect composure made an astonishing remark.
“Sha pu kou/” he said. “They don’t kill enough!” We both looked at him flabbergasted.
View attachment 120523
Hong Kong cockroach brutally beaten by Tibetan villager for insulting the Chairman Mao portrait on display in their house.
This is an idiotic argument. China spends less of its GDP in the military than the US. The truth is China should be spending more. Not spending enough on defense means you might end up just like Libya. Or Qing China for that matter. We still see US warmongers claim that China can be nuked without fear of retaliation. Even after the DF-31AG and DF-41 entered service. So yes a massive nuclear buildup is necessary to prevent such dangerous thoughts. And given the current size of the Chinese economy, plus modern technology, this does not need to break the bank. The fact is the US itself is currently in the process of upgrading its nuclear arsenal by building the Columbia class submarines, and the replacement to Minuteman. And somehow the US can afford this despite having deficits of like a trillion dollars a year. Why wouldn't China be able to?China Is Making the Same Mistakes the Soviets Did
Instead of massively expanding the country’s nuclear arsenal, Chinese leaders ought to focus on energizing its economy and technological prowess.
By Minxin Pei
This guy comes up with so many funny articles like this. Which always try to portray US as the unbeatable behemoth and China as weak and it always tries to convince a non existant Chinese audiance how China should give up and become US vassal.
China that only spends 1.6% of its GDP on Military is going to lose the Arms race because US and its allies have more total GDP. Does the US and its list of Core allies have the industrial might and infrastracture to beat China in an Arms race if China really wanted to fight one?
Some US officials are just hella uneducated. Remember that idiot that wanted to import iron dome to defend against hypersonic missiles?This is an idiotic argument. China spends less of its GDP in the military than the US. The truth is China should be spending more. Not spending enough on defense means you might end up just like Libya. Or Qing China for that matter. We still see US warmongers claim that China can be nuked without fear of retaliation. Even after the DF-31AG and DF-41 entered service. So yes a massive nuclear buildup is necessary. And given the current size of the Chinese economy, plus modern technology, this does not need to break the bank. The fact is the US itself is currently in the process of upgrading its nuclear arsenal by building the Columbia class submarines, and the replacement to Minuteman. And somehow the US can afford this. Why wouldn't China be able to?
Beware he is currently Philippines' Special Envoy of the President to the People’s Republic of China for Special Concerns@ansy1968 and everyone here, how would you read thus post from the Philippines former Foreign Affairs Secretary's made on social media. Is it appropriate comment to make or people are simply too dumb to understand his sophisticated and intellectual commentary? Lol
But that dude has unhealthy admiration for Wang Yi. LolBeware he is currently Philippines' Special Envoy of the President to the People’s Republic of China for Special Concerns