I haven't read the book, but it has been discussed quite a bit over on CDF. One of my chief issues is that for all the supposed "credibility" of the book from various retired or serving military and think tank figures, the premise of the conflict is contrived to begin with. One of the biggest hurdles to a good techno-thriller involving China is ironically, the CCP, because their realistic actions in various likely scenarios just aren't that good, narratively speaking. I think that's why the authors had to replace them with a "Directorate" with intentions that can be written to become far more typical of a standard antagonist mold. It's disappointing, because a realistic conflict scenario could easily arise through an accidental happening through the
The book's hawaii surprise attack is also a bit eyebrow raising; I'm not sure if the authors really believed something like that would be possible with all the early warning sensors available today (let alone in a decade's time), or if they intended there to be pearl harbour/IJN esque parallels.
I also didn't know they had "steroid augmented" Chinese soldiers... lol, I imagine that does a good job of showcasing the opfor as unattractive and artificial antagonists O_O
I'm a bit disappointed that it sounds like they didn't even try to avoid cliches.
The book's hawaii surprise attack is also a bit eyebrow raising; I'm not sure if the authors really believed something like that would be possible with all the early warning sensors available today (let alone in a decade's time), or if they intended there to be pearl harbour/IJN esque parallels.
I also didn't know they had "steroid augmented" Chinese soldiers... lol, I imagine that does a good job of showcasing the opfor as unattractive and artificial antagonists O_O
I'm a bit disappointed that it sounds like they didn't even try to avoid cliches.