TerraN_EmpirE
Tyrant King
well if you ask some they will also go to 1 by pointing to claims of hacks of the F35 Program.
LOL! then an enemy would obtain the highest number of bugs ever writtenwell if you ask some they will also go to 1 by pointing to claims of hacks of the F35 Program.
I'm wondering how many years it'll take to drop perhaps from texts like
"But, the F-35 is a big and expensive hammer to crack a small nut. With this in mind, perhaps advocates of the OA-X are correct to insist that the USAF needs a lower-tier CAS platform, at lower cost, that is easily able to operate in low- to medium-threat environments and thus avoid the unnecessary burning of precious F-35 service life."
OA-X shaping up
I'm wondering how many years it'll take to drop perhaps from texts like
"But, the F-35 is a big and expensive hammer to crack a small nut. With this in mind, perhaps advocates of the OA-X are correct to insist that the USAF needs a lower-tier CAS platform, at lower cost, that is easily able to operate in low- to medium-threat environments and thus avoid the unnecessary burning of precious F-35 service life."
OA-X shaping up
based on A10 losses vs performance numbers being blunt if the USAF really wanted a serious OA-X platform they should make it a heavily armed Drone. The mission statement and needs of the job are such that the only reason you would need to get as Brat said "DOWN and DIRTY,"
remove the pilot you can lose the titanium bathtub, you can reduce the size of the bird and drop the cost.
Brat, First The new sensor types are not a single array they are the same distributed aperture array concept as the F35 dozens of cameras,The problem I have with this is #1 I hate drones, (I hate the idea of an armed killing machine in my vicinity with no ON/OFF switch), anybody who's ever flown a flight sim from the cockpit knows how difficult situational awareness is in a one dimensional camera view. I just don't trust a UAV to know when to say NO, we've already had way to many collateral calamities.
The two jets – part of Australia’s largest and most controversial defence purchase worth about $17bn – will take part in Avalon air show
Two F-35 Joint Strike Fighter jets have landed in Australia for the first time, arriving at Amberley air force base outside Brisbane on Monday.
Australia has in the country’s largest – and most controversial – defence purchase, in a deal worth about $17bn. The jets will at a cost per fighter of about US$90m.
The United States air force ; the $379bn program to develop and builder the fighter is the Pentagon’s largest weapons project.
But the project, which was launched in 2001, has been plagued by long delays, cost overruns of nearly 70% and technical problems.
Problems with the fighter jet have included and increased risk of neck injury to lower-weight pilots when they eject from the aircraft. The jet was also reportedly outperformed by the .
Suggestions by that the US may review or cut its F-35 joint strike fighter procurement in Australia’s plans to buy the jet.
Australia’s first F-35 jets are now based at Luke air force base in Arizona, with four RAAF pilots training to fly the fifth-generation aircraft. The F-35 will replace the ageing FA-18A/B Classic Hornets.
The RAAF F-35s will be revealed to the public at the Avalon air show in Victoria at the weekend.