F-35 Joint Strike Fighter News, Videos and pics Thread

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
V22B proven for F135 transport.
150521-M-GX379-119.JPG module-704x396.jpg
Sailors and Marines remove a power module for the F-35B Lightning II aircraft from an MV-22 Osprey assault support aircraft aboard the amphibious assault ship USS Wasp (LHD 1). Wasp is underway conducting the first phase of operational testing for the F-35B Lightning II aircraft. - See more at:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Marine Ospreys Support Lightning Out at Sea

By Cpl. Anne Henry | U.S. Marine Corps
Thursday, June 4, 2015

As Marines and sailors have been working together to conduct an assessment of F-35B Lightning II integration into amphibious operations over the past two weeks, they are learning to overcome the challenges inherent in maintaining and resupplying one of the world's most advanced pieces of military technology while out at sea.

One key component of the F-35B Operational Trials, or OT-1, included assessing the maintenance and logistical measures necessary to keep the F-35B flying aboard a U.S. Navy amphibious vessel in standard sea conditions.

The F-35B engine power module found itself at center stage of the OT-1 supply and logistics capability assessment about sixty miles off the East Coast of the United States May 21.

The power module is the largest and most important part of the F-35B's engine. Weighing about 4,500 pounds, safely transporting this intricate piece of technology from a storage facility on a military base in the States, across ocean waters, and onto the deck of a pitching ship is no easy task. And it had never been done before.

"The power module is the core of the F-35B engine," said Michael Chotkowski, who is in charge of F-35B deployment integration with Pratt & Whitney. "The engine is broken down into five different modules: fan, augmenter, nozzle, gearbox and the power, which is the number one module."

Up until a few months ago, there was no way to transport replacement power modules to a ship, or damaged power modules from the ship to a repair facility. That was, until a system was put in place using an MV-22B Osprey, a shipping stand constructed with internal suspension, known as a "buck," and an overhead bridge crane aboard the ship to insert the power module into the plane.

"Pratt & Whitney had to design and build a shipping buck that could constrain and protect the power module when it is in the back of an MV-22B," said Jeff Ward, who is in charge of F-35B deployment integration with Headquarters Marine Corps. "The buck, which is the critical piece here, did not exist six months ago. It was created to hold and protect the power module while it is being transported."

The buck was designed as a portable casing to roll the power module onto and off the Osprey. It also serves to protect the power module in the back of an MV-22B Osprey as it flies across the open sea, where it is subjected to the standard movement and vibrations that are inherent in amphibious flight operations due to high winds and rough water.

"The buck has four solid steel posts and two tools on the front and on the back mount of the engine cases. This provides structural integrity," said Chotkowski. "It also has vibratory isolators built into it that are tuned to dampen out the frequencies that come from the MV-22B, and could do damage to the bearings in the power module."

Part one of the operation consisted of loading the power module onto a buck at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland. Next, an MV-22B Osprey from New River, North Carolina flew into Patuxent River to pick up the module and buck. Then the Osprey flew more than 60 miles out to the ship, touching down on the deck of USS Wasp, as it rolled with the waves. The team then wheeled the buck out of the Osprey and onto the deck of the ship, with just several inches of clearance on either side.

"The process of unloading the module from the MV-22B is very difficult, because even though the module outside of its container is smaller, it is still very large for the MV-22B," said David Myersm, who is a part of the cargo and special operations team with U.S. Naval Air Systems Command. "It took 16 straps to tie it down in the aircraft. Cargo in the MV-22B needs to be restrained in a specific manor, and it takes a lot of straps to hold down 9,000 pounds."

The next stage dealt with lowering the power module down to the ship's maintenance bay, and proving the ability to safely transfer the module from the shipping buck into an existing container. This was accomplished by personnel from Marine Operational Test and Evaluation Squadron 22.

"We had to show that we could use the Navy's overhead bridge crane [built into the ceiling of the hangar bay] to transfer the power module from the shipping buck to an existing container, where it can be stored for long term if necessary," said Chotkowski.

The demonstration proved to be successful, allowing for data to be drawn and lessons to be learned for future F-35B deployments aboard amphibious vessels.

"From this evolution, we know that we can now put a power module into an MV-22B and bring it out to an amphibious vessel," said Ward. "We can now resupply the Marine Corps, Navy and Air Force in any environment by using the MV-22B. This is an important milestone for the program."

- See more at:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
TerraN_EmpirE said:
V22B proven for F135 transport.

Sailors and Marines remove a power module for the F-35B Lightning II aircraft from an MV-22 Osprey assault support aircraft aboard the amphibious assault ship USS Wasp (LHD 1). Wasp is underway conducting the first phase of operational testing for the F-35B Lightning II aircraft.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
! And really important news.

Which just paves the way for it doing the same for the F-35C as a COD aircraft on the carriers.
 
Last edited:

Equation

Lieutenant General
module-704x396-jpg.14493

Love to see pics how they fit the cart and the F135 engine onto the elevator.
 
94 aircraft to be procured for 920m:
Lockheed Martin Corp., Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co., Fort Worth, Texas, is being awarded a $920,350,132 advance acquisition contract for long lead time, materials, parts, components, and effort for the manufacture and delivery of 94 F-35 Lightning II low rate initial production aircraft. This contract provides for 78 F-35A aircraft for the Air Force (44), the government of Italy (2), the government of Turkey (2) ; the government of Australia (8); the government of Norway (6); and for various foreign military sales customers (16). In addition, this contract provides for the procurement of 14 F-35B aircraft for the Marine Corps (9), the government of Britain (3) and the government of Italy (2), as well as 2 F-35C aircraft for the Navy and Marine Corps. Work will be performed in Fort Worth, Texas (55 percent); El Segundo, California (15 percent); Warton, United Kingdom (10 percent); Orlando, Florida (5 percent); Nashua, New Hampshire (5 percent); Baltimore, Maryland (5 percent); and Cameri, Italy (5 percent), and is expected to be completed in May 2019. Fiscal 2015 aircraft procurement (Air Force, Marine Corps, and Navy), non-U.S. Department of Defense participant funding, and foreign military sales funds in the amount of $920,350,132 are being obligated at time of award, none of which will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was not competitively procured pursuant to FAR 6.302-1. This contract combines purchase for Foreign Military Sales program customers ($352,102,228; 38 percent); the Air Force ($227,666,000; 25 percent); non-U.S. Department of Defense participants ($207,086,904; 22 percent); and the Navy/Marine Corps ($133,495,000; 15 percent). The Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Maryland, is the contracting activity (N00019-15-C-0003).
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Broccoli

Senior Member
People are never happy. Here we have piece about F-35 dropping bombs and the writer calls it a "PR move" but if it didn't drop a single bomb he would call it failure for not dropping any bombs.

I guess we'll about to see more people complaining about it's gun when it's clear that F-35 can in fact drop bombs. Just wait and see.

The U.S. Air Force has announced that F-35As will practice air strikes at a major exercise. For two weeks, Air Force pilots will bombard mock targets and fly support missions as soldiers train below. But just what the F-35 pilots will get out of their trip isn’t clear. The stealth fighters carry few bombs, still don’t have the computer code to use their guns.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
Although it's been over a year, but much has been upgraded and improved since. Regardless the program is still ongoing. It doesn't look as bad as when the T-50 engine got caught on fire. There's seems to be no structural damage on the frame.
1285037659455083950.jpg
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


These are the first photos of the F-35A that caught fire on Eglin AFB’s main runway almost a year ago. As you can see, not only is the jet’s stealthy skin badly charred, but its spine was perforated
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
from within.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

We are finally getting information as to what caused the F-35A engine fire that has left the entire …
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


1285037659583979694.jpg


During the nearly year-long investigation, the Air Education Training Command board found:

The cause of the mishap was catastrophic engine failure. The engine failed when the third-stage forward integral arm of a rotor fractured and liberated during takeoff... Pieces of the failed rotor arm cut through the engine’s fan case, the engine bay, an internal fuel tank and hydraulic and fuel lines before exiting through the aircraft’s upper fuselage.

As expected, friction caused the failure of the third-stage rotor and its integral arm. Because the brand new jet was flying outside of the test program, it was put through a normal flight regime right after being delivered.

As a result, the engine’s liner wasn’t ready for prime time and operational g loads only exacerbated the problem. The resulting fix from Pratt and Whitney is basically a process where it breaks-in the engine’s foam liner in advance. It is called “pre-trenching,” and so far it seems to have worked although it’s a crude fix for such an advanced piece of machinery.

The whole affair was and continues to be a stark reminder of just how dumb it was for the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
especially considering it was so far along in its development.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The DoD painted the F-35's alternative jet engine as a huge unneeded expense, one that was…
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


As for the barbecued F-35 and its mangled engine? The estimated damage is an eye-popping $50,000,000. As such, the aircraft will most likely not be repaired. Instead, the components that weren’t effected by the catastrophic engine failure and the resulting fire will be parted out and returned to the supply chain and its carcass might be used for training purposes or put into backup inventory storage.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Although it's been over a year, but much has been upgraded and improved since.

Regardless the program is still ongoing.
Exactly my friend.

This is part of bringing new technology and aircraft online.

The crux of the article, which has a decidedly negative slant to it is this:

The resulting fix from Pratt and Whitney is basically a process where it breaks-in the engine’s foam liner in advance. It is called “pre-trenching,” and so far it seems to have worked...

Yes it is working, and on an entire fleet of aircraft.. Some of the best minds in the industry of engineering and engine design worked on it and came up with.

N\But then this guy simply could not help himself and further reveals his own bias.

...although it’s a crude fix for such an advanced piece of machinery.
Oh really? So he is now the expert and knows something more than the people who designed the engine and the fix? Hardly.

As it is...94 aircraft wre just purchased for the US and several other countries. You think maybe the people doing the purchasing, who know about this mishap know a thing or two?
 
Top