TerraN_EmpirE
Tyrant King
A whole lotta questions need answering. With use by over 40 countries around the world and licensed production in Saudi Arabia and Spain + 20 years of service why was this not noticed a decade ago?With the many G36 users, the BW seems to be the only one really having those issues. The Peshmerga are reported to love those weapons , and the Lithuanians (?) say all is fine. Although their rifles apparently differ significantly.
So was the BW the only one who got screwed by HK when using cheap, unspecified materials for the rifle?
The publicized numbers indicate the loss in accuracy is really significant. There's also the statement that other comparisson systems were able to meet the laid out criteria. But no info wich product that is, how much it weighs or costs in comparison to the G36.
Then there was a part in the report saying while the G36 didn't meet the current requirements for an assault rifle, it is within the specifications agreed upon in 1995. Now that is a completely different issue of course
Currently I'm missing the intent of actually clearing up all these contradictions.
As to alternatives at the time in 94-95 the Germans only looked at the offerings from HK and Steyr.
Today they have again HK or Steyr there are a few other makers in Germany but none that can compete with those two and HK pretty much plays home court in the German armory. If the Germans were to move fore replacement top billing would go to HK for there HK416A5 German government designation G38.
Weight to weight.
G36C 6.2 pounds 9 inch barrel G38C 6.5 pounds 9 inch barrel.
G36K 7.3 pounds 12.5 inch barrel G38K 7.69 pounds 14.5 inch barrel
G36 8 pounds 18.5 inch barrel G38 7.85 pounds 16.5 inch barrel.
and HK416 is about 1.5 times the price of a stock G36. But considering the issues with G36 fixing them will likely be about the same amount of money.