I'd argue Trump wasn't able to bring on any sort of competent Cabinet members as well as key national security and domestic policy advisors, because quite frankly nobody wanted to work or be associated with his administration and his incompetence... Those who were actually competent saw the writing on the wall and resigned by their own will (Nikki Haley), or butted heads with the president and were given the chop (Generals John Kelly and James Mattis). He never was able to properlly staff his administration, and as a result Trump was stuck with staffing hard-right personalities and party donors (Mike Pompeo and Kelly Craft) as well as Bush-era staffers that are way past their sell-by date (William Barr), forming the echo chamber of advisors as you mentioned.Trump brought in an echo chamber of hard core (possibly racist, ultra nationalist) anti-china advisors in many key positions. Also covid19 probably brought huge loses to Trump's hospitality and office space businesses. Biden is most likely have a more moderate advisors. The downside for China is that Biden may be able to get some alliances against some of China's policy, but trump has change the atmosphere where its doubtful too many country outside of the "usual" suspects will go along.
I think China has more time to become more self sufficent with a Biden presidency as with Trump, who knows if he would try to do something extreme like ban all exports of advance cpu to Chinese companies etc.
With the Republicans looking likely to keep the Senate, I'm worried Biden might not be able to get the key Cabinet picks (Susan Rice and her Benghazi skeletons, Lael Brainard and her China/WTO ties) through committee hearing. Given Biden's age and mental state, it'll be an incompetent Kamala Harris and Republican-approved Cabinet picks running the show - same shit different day.