CV-18 Fujian/003 CATOBAR carrier thread

MwRYum

Major
Can't the engine be replaced with a domestic one?

According to wikipedia Russia builds them too:


Even if the Russian option isn't available, if it's very useful and you are planning on training lots of pilots, and you have lots of talented engineers, it might be worth spending money on.
Considering how earlier variant(s) were introduced into services at small batches and how hard those outfits clocking flight hours on those airframes, it's more economical and make more sense logistically to bring in whole new variant airframes to unify the entire fleet.
 

no_name

Colonel
In any case, the USN will surpass the PLAN in 2027, when the second of the Gerald Ford class, the “John Kennedy”, will also be incorporated, so there will be a tie in the number of ships, but not in the number of “EMALS” since there will be 8 in the 2 CVNs of the US Navy and 3 and 1 for the “Fujian” and “Sichuan” respectively.
Hard to say if by end of 2027 whether China's own first nuclear carrier will be finished, and whether there will be follow ups for 076.
 

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
Can't the engine be replaced with a domestic one?

According to wikipedia Russia builds them too:


Even if the Russian option isn't available, if it's very useful and you are planning on training lots of pilots, and you have lots of talented engineers, it might be worth spending money on.
I'm sure it's doable, but it's still a bunch of busy work for HAIC just so JL-10 has another engine source. It's a question of if that's worth doing vs just going with one of the other five options. Surely SAC wouldn't mind getting that money instead for them to work on a J-15ST, they might even figure out some further Flanker improvement while doing it that's applicable to other Flanker versions too.
 
Top