CV-18 Fujian/003 CATOBAR carrier thread

SlothmanAllen

Junior Member
Registered Member
Given how loathe this carrier is already without being nuclear, what benefits will there be to moving to a nuclear carrier? Range and endurance?

Also, does the size of this carrier point towards a potentially much larger nuclear carrier? Potentially greater than Nimitz/Gerald R. Ford class in size?
 

Intrepid

Major
Given how loathe this carrier is already without being nuclear, what benefits will there be to moving to a nuclear carrier? Range and endurance?
Yes, and more aviation fuel.



Also, does the size of this carrier point towards a potentially much larger nuclear carrier? Potentially greater than Nimitz/Gerald R. Ford class in size?
No, the Ford class is an optimal size. It is better to build more carriers than larger carriers.
 

SlothmanAllen

Junior Member
Registered Member
Yes, and more aviation fuel.




No, the Ford class is an optimal size. It is better to build more carriers than larger carriers.

Yes, I guess it makes sense as well from a risk perspective. A bigger carrier would also mean a much bigger risk in the event it was lost during combat. Already, even the loss of Nimitz Class / Gerald R. Ford Class is too much to fathom.
 

SlothmanAllen

Junior Member
Registered Member
Yes, I guess it makes sense as well from a risk perspective. A bigger carrier would also mean a much bigger risk in the event it was lost during combat.

Yes, but the landing strip should be 250 meters long and a catapult has more than 100 meters. So a CATOBAR-carrieres flightdeck is normaly longer than 300 meters. The 330 meters of the Ford class is the optimal size for an air wing of 50 aircraft.

Thanks for the insight Intrepid.
 

lee670523

Just Hatched
Registered Member
Hi, I have a question about flight lifts. Will flight lifts work during fighter take-off and landing?

Thanks!
 
Top