CV-18 Fujian/003 CATOBAR carrier thread
- Thread starter Jeff Head
- Start date
You're assuming that no work was done after the module relocation which shouldn't be the case. The existence of those canopies suggest there will be further work done on them which is confirmed with the gray colored deck plating for each module. As a result, those modules would look a little different and may not be placed in the order that was last seen in the previous location. Unfortunately, the poor quality of these photos will continue to make things difficult for all PLA watchers.
Same observation.
1. the floating dock commissioning hasn't got any business with the carrier construction
2. the basin hasn't got any relationship with the construction of the carrier
3. the original place of the construction was only a module welding place, the real assembly place is the current position.
1. the floating dock commissioning hasn't got any business with the carrier construction
2. the basin hasn't got any relationship with the construction of the carrier
3. the original place of the construction was only a module welding place, the real assembly place is the current position.
It may or may not but the superstructure does not need to match the width of the ship beam to beam.
Are these plans or aspirations? I thought they were going with a navalized j-20 at some point and I didn't see anything about a stealthy ucav.
They were going with navalized FC-31 for carrier operations. The UCAV in question was on display during the 2019 National Parade.
Is that a ucav for carrier operations as implied in that image or is it a land ucav? What is it called?
Probably navalized version of GJ-11 (known as Sharpsword during prototype phase).
