Chinese scientists searched far and wide and examined more than 140 bat species for traces of covid and found none. There is simply no covid found in nature. Seems to me like a boon for the lab proponents like Dr. Chris Martenson.
Many coronaviruses share key features with SARS CoV 2, but only very distantly related species share fusion cleavage sites. Suggesting non natural origin of SARS CoV 2. Natural evolution of SARS CoV 2 is astronomically small.
You have the burden of proof wrong; any accusations of an artifical origin must be proven. It is not assumed to be artificial if there is no proof that it is natural. Otherwise, the US needs to prove that it came from nature lest it be assumed to have come from Detrick.Evolution works in small incremental steps. The only way SARS CoV 2 can evolve from distantly related bat coronaviruses which have fusion cleavage sites and become closely related to SARS which does not have fusion cleavage sites is one huge evolutionary jump in one step. Such probability is extremely small, not much bigger than the probability bacteriaphage suddenly mutates and gains the ability to infect humans. Yes, the probability is not zero, but it is extremely small, less than 0.000000000000001% per day, less than probability a large asteroid hits Earth and causes a major extinction event.
Unless scientists can find a species in bats that is closely related to SARS CoV 2 and also has fusion cleavage sites, then they cannot prove SARS CoV 2 is natural and not man made.
TomSelleck said:Evolution works in small incremental steps. The only way SARS CoV 2 can evolve from distantly related bat coronaviruses which have fusion cleavage sites and become closely related to SARS which does not have fusion cleavage sites is one huge evolutionary jump in one step. Such probability is extremely small, not much bigger than the probability bacteriaphage suddenly mutates and gains the ability to infect humans.
Fast-spreading variants that were first identified in the United Kingdom, South Africa and Brazil have not yet been tested for their ability to infect animals. But all the new variants contain a mutation that can make the virus infectious to laboratory mice (Mus musculus), which are resistant to versions without the mutation. The new variants’ global spread increases the possibility that house mice, and perhaps also rats, will acquire the infection from people and contaminated environments such as sewers, says Gryseels