well that seems like a 'tradition ' just like B-919A
COMAC C919
- Thread starter Deino
- Start date
Yes, but B-919A is a specific case: it was the very first series production aircraft, there were more than 4 months before type certification when it flew for the first time and 7 months before its delivery - so, it needed to make many test flights before certification and delivery. Hope the second production aircraft to be delivered much sooner - that's why it seems strange to paint it in manufacturer livery...
Btw, aircraft 008 (B-001K) its more than 4.5hr-long maiden flight in Shanghai today, 8 May 2023, due to fr24!
B-919A is still under testing
And the malfunction has made COMAC stressful
IMO the US supplier of the thrust reverser fot the LEAP 1C engine would be suffering from more stress thsn COMAC.
Now that China apart from replacing and fixing those faulty components, COMAC may decides to replace the engine altogether with their CJ-1000A.
BTW the COMAC 919 did not malfunctioned as alleged by you.
“6”
It's certain but not now and it's 'must' decide
Even though it's still COMAC's 'fault'
You just don't understand 'Chinese'
You won't realize how suffering it is to see so many dogs eating mental dog food from US(And US even doesn't need to pay too much for it) and bark loudly on PRC's LAN Internet
My most recent thoughts on C919
Relax, this is just one of the many growing paints C919 will experience along the way. Thankfully, Boeing & airbus will do nothing for a while
Relax, this is just one of the many growing paints C919 will experience along the way. Thankfully, Boeing & airbus will do nothing for a while