Chinese UCAV/CCA/flying wing drones (ISR, A2A, A2G) thread

mack8

Junior Member
OMG….do I see folding wing lines or are my eyes deceiving me? Or whatever AI photography is making things up…..
You mean the twin diagonal lines roughly across the cockades, rather than the all moving wingtips? Well, wouldn't surprise me, maybe that's why they have two similar size UADFs, one for PLAAF and one for PLANAF. Could be just a structural seam though. What do others think?
 
Presumably because integrating fully optimized VLO engines would substantially increase cost for a platform (CCA) that is meant to be produced in large numbers and reasonably attritable, albeit not exactly cheap.

Stealth nozzles will increase cost and weight. Considering this is an aircraft similar in size to the JF-17, the slight RCS (Radar Cross-Section) increase is acceptable—it might even make it appear like a larger manned aircraft on radar.
Yet they decided to adopt stealthy rectangular nozzles on one of the smaller, less capable CCAs shown in the parade?
 

laurenjia

New Member
Registered Member
You mean the twin diagonal lines roughly across the cockades, rather than the all moving wingtips? Well, wouldn't surprise me, maybe that's why they have two similar size UADFs, one for PLAAF and one for PLANAF. Could be just a structural seam though. What do others think?
yes...where the PLA AIr Force insignia is. The landing gear was not suggestive of it being a naval version.....sneaky of them....
 

SanWenYu

Captain
Registered Member
View attachment 160010
The tarp covers the gap you are trying to point out but you can see the middle hump and overall shape still be the same. If we had a better resolution we could have compared the truck numbers. But I think they are the same.
It could be due to the angles of the views but the one wrapped in tarp looks shorter and having a different angle of wing sweeping.
 
Top