Chinese UAV/UCAV development

Status
Not open for further replies.

drowingfish

Junior Member
Registered Member

banjex

Junior Member
Registered Member
I'm not sure drones will be useful for logistics, at least in high intensity campaigns against a near peer.

Witness the current war where hundreds, if not thousands of trucks are needed to maintain operations.

The Kamaz 4350 which is the Russian army's most common truck carries about four tonnes with a 10 16 tonne version available, IIRC.

In other words, almost triple the capacity of this drone.

Plus trucks can tow artillery, mortars and other vehicles.
 
Last edited:

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
I'm not sure drones will be useful for logistics, at least in high intensity campaigns against a near peer.

Witness the current war where hundreds, if not thousands of trucks are needed to maintain operations.

The Kamaz 4350 which is the Russian army's most common truck carries about four tonnes with a 10 tonne version available, IIRC.

In other words, almost triple the capacity of this drone.

Plus trucks can tow artillery, mortars and other vehicles.

It is important for sending high value assets to hard to reach places, like sending life-saving medicine or spare parts to a remote location not accessible by road.
 

by78

General
China's UCAV force gets more camera time.

52411751789_0d71a88251_o.jpg
52410964027_4337fd0772_o.jpg
52411468671_e41a97d673_h.jpg
52411751874_1c08a791d5_h.jpg
52411468696_633e45aee5_h.jpg
 

Sinnavuuty

Senior Member
Registered Member
I'm not sure drones will be useful for logistics, at least in high intensity campaigns against a near peer.

Witness the current war where hundreds, if not thousands of trucks are needed to maintain operations.

The Kamaz 4350 which is the Russian army's most common truck carries about four tonnes with a 10 16 tonne version available, IIRC.

In other words, almost triple the capacity of this drone.

Plus trucks can tow artillery, mortars and other vehicles.
There are several reasons to use a drone for logistical support. As @siegecrossbow mentioned, hard-to-reach places is one of the advantages, trucks depend on roads and can be targets of IED putting soldiers and the logistical load itself in danger or can be frequently attacked by infiltrators as we saw russian trucks in the first months in Ukraine, in addition to among these advantages there is the time factor, a drone will deliver supplies much faster than a truck regardless of distance, this is vital in the field of logistical support.
 

Abominable

Major
Registered Member
The main problem of LGB is the huge, power consuming designator which needs extra cooling design. That means it can only be installed in relatively large platforms, while laser rangers are so light that even DJI marvics are decent for them.

another problem is that the designator can only guide the bomb for a short time before overheating, while datalink can guide as long as you want.
Very few military drones are solely battery powered. Most have drone engines have a generator which can keep any on board batteries topped up.

Laser designators aren't big anymore and are passively cooled. The Russian Orlan drone has a laser designator.
 

banjex

Junior Member
Registered Member
There are several reasons to use a drone for logistical support. As @siegecrossbow mentioned, hard-to-reach places is one of the advantages, trucks depend on roads and can be targets of IED putting soldiers and the logistical load itself in danger or can be frequently attacked by infiltrators as we saw russian trucks in the first months in Ukraine, in addition to among these advantages there is the time factor, a drone will deliver supplies much faster than a truck regardless of distance, this is vital in the field of logistical support.
I see your IEDs and raise you jamming plus widely available short range SAMs (Tor and Strela type systems). I take the point, but logistics drones will be more of a niche thing in my view rather than mainstream.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top