Might as well go for GaO-on-Diamond.
Also from semi thread, looks like HIT got diamond substrate to work with CETC's GaN devices. So, we are moving to GaN-on-Diamond soon.
Might as well go for GaO-on-Diamond.
Also from semi thread, looks like HIT got diamond substrate to work with CETC's GaN devices. So, we are moving to GaN-on-Diamond soon.
What's usually the timelines from tech breakthroughs to real life implementations in this sector?cross posting with semi thread
CETC says it has made breakthrough in MMW band GaN 1 piece T/R chip on silicon substrate. Allows for next-generation high power T/R chip.
Can be used in commercial aerospace, satellite signal transmission and such. Also, I would imagine just MMW AESA radar for helicopters and other assets that use MMW band radar.
Myself and others have explained why the use of materials in the civilian sector at a given time period does not automatically equate to production ready capability on a military aircraft in the same time period.
You also have not demonstrated any credible rumours (such as from PRC side credible individuals) or evidence to support your confident statement.
Translation:我们现在主要的舰载和机载的雷达的功率放大器件,早就已经采用氮化镓收发的器件,早在2008年我国开发的这种氮化镓的收发单元的单位功率已经是119瓦,而美国直到现在主力的雷达器件大部分采用的还是砷化镓器件。
当然,客观地说,美国并不是没有氮化镓器件上的技术能力,美国是因为其战略上的重大失误延缓了技术的提升。现在美军最新的APG85采用的也是氮化镓器件,但是它的进展很慢。而中国更下一代的氧化镓器件也已经取得了重要的突破。
The power amplifiers of our main shipborne and airborne radars have long been using gallium nitride transceivers. As early as 2008, the unit power of the gallium nitride transceiver unit developed by my country was 119 watts, while the main radar devices in the United States still mostly use gallium arsenide devices.
Of course, objectively speaking, the United States is not without the technical capabilities of gallium nitride devices. The United States has delayed the improvement of technology because of its major strategic mistakes. The latest APG85 of the US military also uses gallium nitride devices, but its progress is very slow. China's next-generation gallium oxide devices have also made important breakthroughs.
at 13:50 汪涛(who was a former executive at ZTE) said:
Translation:
This guy seems to know what he's talking about since he was part of the industry before.
does anybody now that is this?View attachment 156030