Patriot missiles getting humiliated by Iranian drones didn’t prevent the U.S. from selling them to the Saudis/Ukraine. I don’t see what the big deal is.
Patriot missiles getting humiliated by Iranian drones didn’t prevent the U.S. from selling them to the Saudis/Ukraine. I don’t see what the big deal is.
Even if they have access to more detailed information and conclude that the radar was not used as intended, they may face pressures from the public/other stakeholders due to the bad publicity.
Of course
What a weird line of thinking. The US has had F-16, M-1, M-2, M-777, HIMARS, Patriot, M-270, etc. lost in Ukraine, hundreds of them in total and worth up to billions of dollars. Are you worried about the publicity for American weapons and their future oversea markets?Yes, it isn't about how effective these radar system actually is. It's about bad publicity for Chinese weapons and future oversea markets
What a weird line of thinking. The US has had F-16, M-1, M-2, M-777, HIMARS, Patriot, M-270, etc. lost in Ukraine, hundreds of them in total and worth up to billions of dollars. Are you worried about the publicity for American weapons and their future oversea markets?
Yeah "battle tested" and "effective" in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, prior to in Ukraine. How many airplanes and helicopters did the US lose in Vietnam alone? I heard the numbers were in thousands. These weapons, operated by the Americans themselves, were destroyed by "third world armies" and even guerillas. That didn't stop the US from being able to sell more weapons worth of trillions to its vassals and client states after the wars.Let's be real,Chinese and American weapons are not in the same position on international arms market at the moment. US weapons have been proven effective in mutiple large scale wars,thanks to the US involvement in those wars. Chinese weapons on the other hand,aren't battle tested,the effectiveness is unknown,that is what many military analysts says.
You want to showcase how good your weapons are? First you need to start a war
It's just Western propaganda. Western weapons are very effective when you already have a heavy advantage. Those "large scale wars" are just the US beating on a little country. It wouldn't have mattered what weapons they had because they don't have the network, numbers, and training to make them effective. When they don't have that advantage, as we saw in Sindoor, Chinese weapons outshined them. By all accounts, India has more aircraft and a higher military budget than Pakistan, but the advantage was not enough this time. For Western weapons to be "proven effective," the power difference needs to be US vs Iraq or Venezuela kind of difference.Let's be real,Chinese and American weapons are not in the same position on international arms market at the moment. US weapons have been proven effective in mutiple large scale wars,thanks to the US involvement in those wars. Chinese weapons on the other hand,aren't battle tested,the effectiveness is unknown,that is what many military analysts says.
You want to showcase how good your weapons are? First you need to start a war
Let's be real,Chinese and American weapons are not in the same position on international arms market at the moment. US weapons have been proven effective in mutiple large scale wars,thanks to the US involvement in those wars. Chinese weapons on the other hand,aren't battle tested,the effectiveness is unknown,that is what many military analysts says.
You want to showcase how good your weapons are? First you need to start a war