Chinese purchase of Su-35

That is true, the question is still whether this specific deal is actually worthwhile (does it even help the Russians decrease the cost of their frontline aircraft procurement for example, let alone helping China's strategic requirements)?

Many aspects and the relatively small scale of this deal, if it exists, can indicate China and Russia using it to see if they can maximize mutual benefits to mutual satisfaction on such military technology opportunities, the answer so far appears to be no.

The question is will the geostrategic balance shift with a Trump presidency? I'm far from an expert but I think all indications show a much warmer ties in US/Russian relations with Trump than it is with Obama.

The question is assuming such 'bond' materlizes will it negatively affect or strain Russian/china ties or alienate China?

That phone call from Taiwanese PM to Trump is already pissing off China and if Trump idoubles down on the SCS while at the same time buddy buddy with Putin, I can see China feeling like the 3rd wheel.

This is the point I made some time ago that the Trump administration's overtures to improve ties with Russia may well be for the purpose of further containing China, just as the US had in the past improved ties with China to further contain the USSR.
 

Engineer

Major
If such a deal never come true. It might hide another reason behind that. The only credible reason why PLAAF would be committed to buy Su-35 would be to get their hands on the 117S engine, which would help them in getting more powerful WS-10 variants and at maybe at the same time, help them ramping up the D-30KP alternative (namely WS-20).

Appart from this fact, I see no justification whatsover in buying such planes when local alternatives are available. This deal is more like getting 48 117S overpriced engines inside russian-made test airframes IMHO.
The notion that China wants the 117S is another invention by the Russian after the J-20 first flight. Five years later, with the J-20 entering LRIP, not a single 117S engine is in sight. It shows how little correlation there is between Russian claims and reality.
 

Engineer

Major
too much self praise my friend, Su-35 has something that still you can not see, it does supercruise, it is not a maybe, it is a fact, PAKFA does supercruise too, but 117 is not the most advanced engine in the world, already type 30 is in the bench test.
Su-35 has something that cannot be seen, because those something doesn't exist.

Russia passed all the structural technology of Su-27, J-11 is not more than a cloned aircraft built upon Russian technology, you degree of anti-christian Orthodox bias is great did you forget your Russian Rivals under putin have more pro-christian values than your own nation?
Wrong. Su-27 is Soviet's technology. To this day, Russia is still modifying Soviet technology instead of coming up with something new.

Today Su-35 has a radar of 400km. do you understand that to make a radar of such power you need engines generating such voltage? Al-31 will need to generate very large amounts of electricity and have extra batteries plus circuits that lose less energy in heat to reach Su-35`s irbis power.

Do you think i believe J-11 even with AESA can reach 400km? be my guest, it will need lots of batteries and electricity generators and Radar emitters that heat up much much less than even American circuits or french circuits on F-22, F-35 and Rafale, be my guest, but in vilified Russian`s putin the orthodox church plays a role to reduce abortion and with success.
From customers' testimonials, Russian's radars don't have a good track record at meeting the advertised performance figures. Furthermore, Irbis being a PESA and a generation behind, it naturally consumes more power with less efficiency than AESA.
 

Engineer

Major
Su-35 would be just supplementary to Chinese Flankers (J-11B, J-16 , J-11D). They're not meant to be primary frontline aircraft. As I said, and I'm sure everyone knows, Su-35 would not be what Su-27 was to China 25 years ago. As for the exact number, I'm sure PLAAF has better handle on that. There is no need for us to argue whether 24, 36 or 48 makes most sense. They would be a small fraction of the Flanker fleet family regardless.
Su-35 would not supplement Chinese Air Force in anyway unless they are fitted with Chinese avionics. Not only did the Russian media themselves reported that isn't going to happen, they claimed that even the displays are to be Cyrillic because, and I paraphrase, "Russian language is better than Chinese language". As far as I see, this Su-35 is merely the last straw that certain fanboys cling on to to support the belief that Russian is still a leader in aviation.
 

Engineer

Major
True China builds lots of products, many of them of really shoddy quality, you forget the Russia has built and exported hundreds of Su-27s, that the Su-27 family has different generations, a Su-27 built in 1986 is not the same built in 2016.
Chinese quality may be shoddy, but it is still better than Russian quality. That's one of the reason why the Su-27 deal was terminated early.

Our Chinese colleges here are saying China does not need the Su-35, but let us go J-11 is not a Chinese product but a Russian license of Su-27 with some enhancements, but Russia has not been idle, the Chinese claimed they improved the Al-31 service life, but in that same period Russia built the Al-31F-M2/3 variants, which are much better than any Chinese improvement, in fact they boast about WS-10 but still 117S is a much more modern engine and China still buys Al-31s.

Many Chinese programs have Ukrainian Russian finger prints, Y-20 for example has direct Antonov, Assistance, same ARJ-21, L-15 and many Chinese programs.

So i will put it simple, 117S gives to China two advantages longer range and higher speed on Flanker platforms.
The same old attempt at trying to claim somebody else's effort as Russian's.

The Al-31F was designed and perfected by the Soviets, and Ukraine played a major role. The Al-31F derivatives including 117S are Russian modifications based on Soviet technologies. Were China to have access to the same technical documentation that Russia inherited, China could do the samething, just as China is doing now with imported Ukraine engines.

As a derivative of the Al-31F, the 117S is still an engine for fourth generation aircraft. The 117S is still in the same class as WS-10 no matter how you inflate the thrust figure. Not even Russia has F-119 class engine in production. So Russia and China are at equal footing in engine technologies.

The difference between China with WS-10 and Russia with Al-31F is that China ran through the whole design cycle of a modern turbofan engine and brought the WS-10 to maturity. Russia has no such experience aside from basking in Soviet's glory.

The Su-35 is a great enhancement to the J-11 fleet, here our colleges minimize the fact Su-35 supercruises, but basically it means less fuel spent so it means longer range add Su-35 carries more fuel internally, (which means new internal structures and enhanced avionics) means Su-35 enhances power projection over any J-11.
Even J-20 with inferior engines can not compete, regardless you say it is stealthy, J-20 has not better engines, it is almost as large as a Su-35 and at least as heavy, so it has no better range.
Su-35 is based on the same aerodynamics as Su-27. An airframe which isn't designed for supercruise in the first place isn't optimized for supercruise. A slight increase in engine thrust isn't going to compensate for exponential increase in air drag.

Russia's own boasting of Su-35 supercruise capability only claimed the aircraft can still manage to accelerate after passing the speed-of-sound. The claim stops short of mentioning the top supercruise speed and never mentions combat load. It is not a true supercruise capability that F-22 has.

Russia is not about charity, China pays or no deal, Russia needs money, and Su-35 is a very advanced weapon, is 5th generation subsystems on a 4th generation fuselage, J-20 is a 5th generation fuselage but lacks the most important 5th generation thing, without it, no supercruise, no STOL, no super maneuverability, and no post stall regardless of what you say without TVC nozzles there is no credible post stall handling, so in few words the Su-35 is a gift Russia is not willing to sell without the most money they can get, Russia knows China eventually will get the technology embedded in 117S, but for them they will make sure they take more time and they get the most money, so China and Russia are negotiating and for that reason it has taken long
Post-stall maneuverability is tactically useless. The major reason why Russia still promotes it is because Russia has nothing else to promote, not that post-stall maneuverability is any good.
 
Last edited:

Engineer

Major
Besides if China isn't getting the best export version, then it shouldn't buy it all.
This.

Su-35 fanboys keep saying how Su-35 is so superior to anything that China has, yet at the sametime says China isn't going to be allowed to get anything that superior. The two positions are contradicting one another. There is no point in the deal if China is to get a Russian version to something that China already has.:rolleyes:
 

weig2000

Captain
Never trust the Russians.

Hey, guys. Go easy. There is no need to bash Russians here. Russia is still a partner to China and has provided many defense systems that China needed over the years. China has benefited from the cooperation handsomely.

While I don't buy b787 or Russia's hyperbole about Su-35 completely, it's the pride thing for Russia. Whether it's a rumor or a deal, it's China that is potentially interested in buying Russian aircraft, not the other way around.

We should all probably move on from this subject, until there is real confirmation of the deal happening, or not.
 

SinoSoldier

Colonel
it's China that is potentially interested in buying Russian aircraft, not the other way around.

That's exactly the myth that people on this forum are trying to debunk, and frankly the source of much of the ire directed against the Russians. The pattern of Russian offers, fake news articles, and unilateral reporting of the supposed deal makes it blindingly clear that it is Russia (or the Russian media) that wishes to sell its Su-35, far more so than China is willing to buy.
 
Top