I am a bit confused, they specified that the CHD620 is a electric generator instead of an engine which they use to describe the MTU396.
So does that mean that the CHD620 is already used on a submarine, just never in the role of the engine?
Is there any difference between a diesel generator and diesel engine?
The terminology used in that article is indeed confusing. In the typical contemporary diesel-electric submarine:
1. There are two or more diesel engines.
2. Each diesel engine drives an electricity generator. (An engine-generator combination is often referred to simply as a "generator," e.g., "The hospital has diesel generators for backup power.")
2. The generators charge the batteries.
3. The batteries power an electric motor, which turns the screw, i.e., propeller.
There is no mechanical linkage between the diesel engines and the screw, so in that sense the diesel engines are not propulsion engines, not in the way a conventional ICE automobile is propelled by its engine.
So the following excerpt from the linked Bangkok Post article is misleading, whether because of inaccurate translation or otherwise:
"The two sides agreed the submarine would be installed with a CHD620 electric generator as a replacement for the German MTU396 engine.
"'The CHD620 is, in fact, a submarine electric generator. It is not meant to serve as an engine,' according to the source."
The CHD620 and the MTU396 are both diesel engines, and in the S26T submarine they do exactly the same thing: They drive an electricity generator that charges the batteries that powers the electric motor that turns the screw. The implication or suggestion that the MTU396 serves as a propulsion engine while the CHD620 does not, or that they work differently from each other, is simply incorrect.