Chinese military exports to other countries

tphuang

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
not really sure. We don't get regular reports on these things.

They do a lot of deal under the table that don't get reported. We find out only when pictures come out. For example, they are building a cutter right now in WuChang shipyard for Namibia. We did not see anything about this one. We didn't even know about the FACs they are building for Pakistan and Bangladesh until much later.
 
escobar

escobar

Brigadier
Bangladesh is getting two more Jianghus (Type 053H2)

oEKTk.jpg

WijlD.jpg
 
H

hmmwv

Junior Member
You may want to note that the picture shows the 554 and 557 for Burmese Navy, the Bangladesh Navy will get 053H2 535 and 536.
 
Kurt

Kurt

Junior Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


This article nicely summarizes many reports about the future development of Russia and China. Add to this the joint PAF FA development of Russia and India and it becomes obvious that the resurgent Russia will possibly have stronger ties to their long-time ally India, including joint developments with the second most important rising nation after China. A world where China and Russia-India compete for weapon contracts against USA and Europe would be multipolar and have few nations cut off from acquiring the systems they want.
While the Chinese economy will profit from the increased weapon export, it's likely such stories will have negative repercussions for cooperation of foreign companies and nations with China, extending the defacto CoCom currently in place.
I understand the Chinese position that wants to increase the benefits to their people by reducing the prices of goods that exist due to know-how monopolies that demand handy payments. On the other hand, the owners of intellectual property want to be compensated for their risks and perils. On the long run, it would be a good idea to reform the intellectual property laws in order to fight misuse while keeping the idea alive of advancing knowledge without the fear of competition outbidding you with your own achievements of development.
 
escobar

escobar

Brigadier
Kurt said:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


This article nicely summarizes many reports about the future development of Russia and China. Add to this the joint PAF FA development of Russia and India and it becomes obvious that the resurgent Russia will possibly have stronger ties to their long-time ally India, including joint developments with the second most important rising nation after China. A world where China and Russia-India compete for weapon contracts against USA and Europe would be multipolar and have few nations cut off from acquiring the systems they want.
While the Chinese economy will profit from the increased weapon export, it's likely such stories will have negative repercussions for cooperation of foreign companies and nations with China, extending the defacto CoCom currently in place.
I understand the Chinese position that wants to increase the benefits to their people by reducing the prices of goods that exist due to know-how monopolies that demand handy payments. On the other hand, the owners of intellectual property want to be compensated for their risks and perils. On the long run, it would be a good idea to reform the intellectual property laws in order to fight misuse while keeping the idea alive of advancing knowledge without the fear of competition outbidding you with your own achievements of development.
Click to expand...

when it is question about china better no read strategypage.
 
asif iqbal

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
there is only thing China needs to truely master, that is high performance jet engines, if China can make them in large numbers in all sizes and shapes then China will take the lead in my areas

Chinas design, development and manufacturing is great for aircraft all it needs is the engines
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top