Chinese Military Exports (Land Systems)

tankphobia

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Combat video… they seem to use the gun at a decently high tempo. Why not use dedicated assault guns for this?
Baseball cap, t-shirt and smart watch while filming themselves in a tank during a war... Feels like a cashed up militia rather than a real military. They are lucky the opposition is equally incompetent.
 

The Observer

Junior Member
Registered Member
Yeah, and what happens if they don't properly maintain it after firing so many rounds? Like I said we don't know what happened

Well, I'd like to know more about the 'proper' maintenance of the main gun, since it's tentatively the problematic piece.

It could be any 125mm smoothbore ammo. It might be Norinco, but we don't know.

Sure, the other option is most likely Ukrainian, since Thailand also have BM Oplot that uses 125mm.

We'll just have to ask and see if the crew will tell us who made the ammo, based on the manufacturer's markings.

Stop with all the speculations because it could literally be anything.

I mean, the whole reason there's so much speculation is because the photo of the accident looks really ugly. Let's review the supposed photo.

1765689642540.png

From the photo, the 125mm gun doesn't just have its barrel going banana peel, the whole thing looks dislodged from its trunnion, with significant discolouring around the trunnion area.

Unless the reason is because the crew & recovery team removed the whole gun for replacement after the accident, that meant there's a significant explosion that took the gun off its mountings.

The ERA on the hull & the turret seems intact, so I think we can discount the probability of the tank taking a hit.

That leaves 2 possible issue, either the barrel burst from overuse/blockage, or the ammo malfunctioned and exploded while in the barrel. Unless the crew is really unlucky and happened to fire a malfunctioning round, the focus will be on the gun and its usage.

I'd say the main questions I have are:
  1. Did they exceed the barrel life round count?
  2. Is there a firing rate limit after a period of high intensity firing, the same way 155mm Artillery have fire rate limit?
  3. If there's any firing rate limit, was it disclosed in the technical & training documents?
 

Tomboy

Senior Member
Registered Member
I don't know what is there to argue about Chinese export weapons. If you pay junk price, China will sell junk quality to you. The motto is that China has something to sell to you depending on how much you can pay. I think China, maybe until recently, simply do not care about the reputation of its export weapons as long as they make money.
Also from day one, we already knew the the Thai VT4 are low configuration compared with Pakistan ones. It is no wonder they chose a 80s cannon for its main gun to keep price down.
Ironically the Thai paid 5M per unit for their VT-4s, by no means "junk price".
 

sutton999

Junior Member
Registered Member
I bet if indeed 200 rounds were fired in a short period. It means the opposite, the brrael is very good.

A 500-round life cycle won't sustain 50 rounds rapid fire, let alone 100 or 200.

--
How many fault pieces in Ukraine war? 10 US fighter jets dropped from sky this year, including a few F35, seems none gave any fuss.

Clam down people.
 

RTB74

New Member
Registered Member
So, my country is incredibly stingy. They pay money to buy cost-reduced products, which are already derived from other cost-reduced products, and then use them heavily within just a few days. That make sense

Even China's PLAGF is given less attention than the other branches of the military. Exports of Land Systems are probably no different.

This incident resulted from cheaping out by Thailand and Norinco.
 

sutton999

Junior Member
Registered Member
So, my country is incredibly stingy. They pay money to buy cost-reduced products, which are already derived from other cost-reduced products, and then use them heavily within just a few days. That make sense

Even China's PLAGF is given less attention than the other branches of the military. Exports of Land Systems are probably no different.

This incident resulted from cheaping out by Thailand and Norinco.
No, it is you who reads too much into some random dude's deranged post.

Look at one post below would cheer you up. Free sample of GAM-102LR, also from China.
 

Nevermore

Junior Member
Registered Member
Let's stay calm about these public opinions. In recent years, U.S. F-16s, F-18s, F-35s, and various drones have crashed numerous times, yet I haven't seen many people dismiss the U.S. military as a paper tiger. Similarly, the downing of Rafales and Su-30s by J-10Cs doesn't affect our objective assessment of these aircraft's performance. Regarding the tank barrel explosion incident, we should await the subsequent investigation report before making judgments. The recent backlash in public opinion stems from years of Western propaganda.
 

N00813

Junior Member
Registered Member
The ERA on the hull & the turret seems intact, so I think we can discount the probability of the tank taking a hit.

That leaves 2 possible issue, either the barrel burst from overuse/blockage, or the ammo malfunctioned and exploded while in the barrel. Unless the crew is really unlucky and happened to fire a malfunctioning round, the focus will be on the gun and its usage.
Can we even be sure the tank didn't take a hit from an FPV or bomb drone, and the gun was hit and had to be replaced?
 

Hitomi

Junior Member
Registered Member
What is the likelihood that the ammunition was not faulty but cooked off from being loaded into an overheated breech since the crew did admit they were involved in high intensity operations for the past few days? Do manufacturer stated lifespan account for near continuous firing over a few hours?
 
Top