MIGleader said:he was very far off. he beilieved it could go 1000+. at 800m, the m-16 is effective, but by no means against armor, even weak armor.
he said chinese missles are cheap crap that always fail
he said the mauser was a copy of the spring field.
<snip>
He got it backwards:
"Contrary to popular belief, the U.S. Springfield Rifle, Model 1903, (See 1903 Springfield) was NOT a product-improved Model 98 Mauser. The War Department had exhaustively studied and dissected several examples of the Mauser Model 93 rifle (See 93 Mauser, above) captured during the Spanish-American War, and combined features of both the U.S. Krag Rifle Models 1894-1898, and the Mauser Model 93, to produce the U.S. Springfield Rifle, Model 1903."
==================
As for his comment on the Chinese missiles:
I suppose one could argue the SA-2's are Russian and not Chinese.