Looks like equipment used for jamming and electronic countermeasures purposes.I wonder what this variant is. Communications perhaps? If so, the radome differs considerably to the known communications variant.
Chinese infantry fighting vehicles
- Thread starter Broccoli
- Start date
Come on, why not put it on tanks?
FriedRiceNSpice
Captain
Wow it looks like it would be incredibly cramped in that thing!
tbh i dont think that thing will even be able to stand against an rpg-7 let alone an rpg-28 or even an autocannon of any kind. the PLA should be retiring those obsolete equipment already
It seems to me if the enemy forces there possess substantial anti-armor capability, the airborne forces should never have been there at all. Airborne forces should be inserted quickly and opportunistically against enemy communication lines in the rear that for various the enemy left uncovered. Geography may require the airborne forces to land some distance from the actual site. Once on the ground the air need to move quickly and rapidly overwhelm light resistance by 3rd line units. Hence light airdropped armored vehicles are essential.
But if the airborne unit finds itself fighting heavy enemy ground units after landing, someone further up the chain of command needs to be shot.
But if the airborne unit finds itself fighting heavy enemy ground units after landing, someone further up the chain of command needs to be shot.
Last edited:
A Mengshi-II electronic warfare vehicle belonging to the PAP.
This looks more like a mortar locating radar than an electronic warfare vehicle.
by78
General
It's a EW vehicle. Also, what use does the PAP have for a counter-battery radar?