I believe the PLA troops does not wear body armour on military exerciseChinese infantry still not wearing body armour.
I believe the PLA troops does not wear body armour on military exerciseChinese infantry still not wearing body armour.
Do you know why? I know China is one of the biggest exporters of body armour, but it has left little for its own troops. NATO troops always wear body armour during exercises. Not sure why the PLA doesn't. Not enough defense budget?I believe the PLA troops does not wear body armour on military exercise
Do you know why? I know China is one of the biggest exporters of body armour, but it has left little for its own troops. NATO troops always wear body armour during exercises. Not sure why the PLA doesn't. Not enough defense budget?
Do you know why? I know China is one of the biggest exporters of body armour, but it has left little for its own troops. NATO troops always wear body armour during exercises. Not sure why the PLA doesn't. Not enough defense budget?
There's always gonna be a need for both IMO. IFV are a little more expensive and design more for combat. APC are good for carrying troops and supplies in a not too dangerous areas where there's no threat from artillery, mortar, or from the skies.Has IFV pretty much replaced the role of APC seeing that it can also ferry troops or did IFV developed further from APC or is there some overlap between the two role?
Yes but the soldiers must be carrying something on same weight to get used whitFirst this is OT, so bring it to the correct thread. Second, you know how big is Chinese military as compared to European militaries? A little bit of common sense would tell you that to equip every single soldiers with body armour even during exercises are going to be too expensive and not needed. Third, despite all the big hooha on body armour, they do have shelve life and can expire. So it is not wise to simply issue body armour to your men immediately even when there is no crisis or war happening, they will wear through these armour very quickly. and the cost to replace these armour is beyond your knowledge.
Finally, from that blurry photos, how to you tell the soldiers are not wearing body armour, do you mean, they need to looked like ironman to be consider wearing body armour?
IFVs also dont get to dangerous area. Or in very dangerous. Always they need to be covered by heavy vehicles. Those whit missiles on them are complementary to tanks.There's always gonna be a need for both IMO. IFV are a little more expensive and design more for combat. APC are good for carrying troops and supplies in a not too dangerous areas where there's no threat from artillery, mortar, or from the skies.
First this is OT, so bring it to the correct thread. Second, you know how big is Chinese military as compared to European militaries? A little bit of common sense would tell you that to equip every single soldiers with body armour even during exercises are going to be too expensive and not needed. Third, despite all the big hooha on body armour, they do have shelve life and can expire. So it is not wise to simply issue body armour to your men immediately even when there is no crisis or war happening, they will wear through these armour very quickly. and the cost to replace these armour is beyond your knowledge.
Finally, from that blurry photos, how to you tell the soldiers are not wearing body armour, do you mean, they need to looked like ironman to be consider wearing body armour?