Chinese General news resource thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah I'm thinking of fasting every other day to see what it does to me. I sort of do it many times now where I only eat dinner. Waiting until the next day won't be that hard for me. I've been reading there may be health benefits to fasting. I sort of try new diets just to see if they do what is advertised. A recent diet is the paleo diet or caveman diet. I tried it and I don't know if this diet was the cause but I had a kidney stone for the first time. I checked up what foods to avoid to prevent kidney stones. Guess what? Nearly all the foods they tell you to eat on the paleo diet have the chemical in foods that cause kidney stones to form.

I remember reading somewhere that some foods can cause kidney stones. If I come across it again I'll share it with you guys.

And as for diet, I was told it's best to have frequent meals of less portions, eat slower, and of course the regular reduction of lipids(saturated and transfat), sugar, overconsumption of carbs, sodium, etc. I was also trying low carb diet for a few days until I eventually kinda just quit. And my question for you is I'm wondering on your veggie side of the consumption. Did you have sufficient of that as well?
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Most kidney stones are a result of a high amount of oxalates in foods. The paleo diet emphasizes dark leafy greens, nuts, and berries. All high in oxalate content. I ate a little more meat than usually but not that much and it was primarily chicken.
 
Most kidney stones are a result of a high amount of oxalates in foods. The paleo diet emphasizes dark leafy greens, nuts, and berries. All high in oxalate content. I ate a little more meat than usually but not that much and it was primarily chicken.

I'm a little surprised because you seemed to eat pretty healthy, and yea chicken is also white meat, which should make things better. Actually have you checked with the doc and hear what he has to say? And by any chance do you consume other things like soda water and such? I heard those can contribute to kidney stones.

Btw I hope this helps:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Types of kidney stones

Knowing the type of kidney stone helps determine the cause and may give clues on how to reduce your risk of getting more kidney stones. Types of kidney stones include:

Calcium stones. Most kidney stones are calcium stones, usually in the form of calcium oxalate. Oxalate is a naturally occurring substance found in food. Some fruits and vegetables, as well as nuts and chocolate, have high oxalate levels. Your liver also produces oxalate. Dietary factors, high doses of vitamin D, intestinal bypass surgery and several metabolic disorders can increase the concentration of calcium or oxalate in urine. Calcium stones may also occur in the form of calcium phosphate.
Struvite stones. Struvite stones form in response to an infection, such as a urinary tract infection. These stones can grow quickly and become quite large, sometimes with few symptoms or little warning.
Uric acid stones. Uric acid stones can form in people who don't drink enough fluids or who lose too much fluid, those who eat a high-protein diet, and those who have gout. Certain genetic factors also may increase your risk of uric acid stones.
Cystine stones. These stones form in people with a hereditary disorder that causes the kidneys to excrete too much of certain amino acids (cystinuria).
Other stones. Other, rarer types of kidney stones can occur.

Factors that increase your risk of developing kidney stones include:

Family or personal history. If someone in your family has kidney stones, you're more likely to develop stones, too. And if you've already had one or more kidney stones, you're at increased risk of developing another.
Being an adult. Kidney stones are most common in adults age 40 and older, though kidney stones may occur at any age.
Being a man. Men are more likely to develop kidney stones, although an increasing number of women are developing kidney stones.
Dehydration. Not drinking enough water each day can increase your risk of kidney stones. People who live in warm climates and those who sweat a lot may be at higher risk than others.
Certain diets. Eating a diet that's high in protein, sodium and sugar may increase your risk of some types of kidney stones. This is especially true with a high-sodium diet. Too much sodium in your diet increases the amount of calcium your kidneys must filter and significantly increases your risk of kidney stones.
Being obese. High body mass index (BMI), large waist size and weight gain have been linked to an increased risk of kidney stones.
Digestive diseases and surgery. Gastric bypass surgery, inflammatory bowel disease or chronic diarrhea can cause changes in the digestive process that affect your absorption of calcium and water, increasing the levels of stone-forming substances in your urine.
Other medical conditions. Diseases and conditions that may increase your risk of kidney stones include renal tubular acidosis, cystinuria, hyperparathyroidism, certain medications and some urinary tract infections.
 

solarz

Brigadier
China isn't going to give up on Diaoyu and Japan increasingly isn't convinced the US will protect it if it a war somehow happens, that's the existential threat to Japan. China could promise peaceful coexistence all it wants, Japan will not buy it.

Are you seriously telling us that Japan believes the Diaoyu Islands are vital to its existence?
 

Franklin

Captain
If you guys are seriously worried about kidney stones I suggets you take vitamin C. What your body does is that it stores the extra vitamin C in your kidney's and that helps to prevent kidney stones. At least that is what i have read.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Sol, Japan has made and enforces its claim to what it calls the Senkaku islands.
the People's Republic of China has done the same for what it calls the Diaoyu islands.
The Republic of China (Taiwan) have staked there claim to the Diaoyu Tai.

A nation does not do such a thing lightly nor as simply a means of insult. Its done when a nation feels that the territory is of critical strategic importance to the nations well being.
trying to claim that Japan has no real interest in the Senkaku despite the obvious defense of them, is not taking the matter seriously. Just because you do not agree with another claim dose not mean that the other claim is not of value.

So does Japan view the Senkaku as of importance? Yes it does. We know that because they are willing to invest the SDF to defend them. Why is it important? The resources, for a island nation like Japan oil and fuel are vital, the fishing industry has the priority right now though. The strategic position, freedom of navigation and security.
 

solarz

Brigadier
Sol, Japan has made and enforces its claim to what it calls the Senkaku islands.
the People's Republic of China has done the same for what it calls the Diaoyu islands.
The Republic of China (Taiwan) have staked there claim to the Diaoyu Tai.

A nation does not do such a thing lightly nor as simply a means of insult. Its done when a nation feels that the territory is of critical strategic importance to the nations well being.
trying to claim that Japan has no real interest in the Senkaku despite the obvious defense of them, is not taking the matter seriously. Just because you do not agree with another claim dose not mean that the other claim is not of value.

So does Japan view the Senkaku as of importance? Yes it does. We know that because they are willing to invest the SDF to defend them. Why is it important? The resources, for a island nation like Japan oil and fuel are vital, the fishing industry has the priority right now though. The strategic position, freedom of navigation and security.

That is simply not true.

Before the nationalization of the islands, China had always proposed joint exploitation of the resources in the waters around the Diaoyu Islands. I don't know if that proposal is still on the table, but it's clear that China had always been willing to share.

The Diaoyu Islands do not have any strategic significance, aside from their economic value. They are too small to host any military installation. Neither do they affect freedom of navigation in any way, considering that they lie between Okinawa and Taiwan. Even counting the 12 nm territorial waters, there is ample room to navigate around it, if necessary. That area is wide open sea.

It is also not true that nations lay claim to a territory only when it has critical strategic importance to that nation's well being. Nations lay territorial claims for a variety of reasons, the chief of which being economic interests. There are extremely few territorial disputes that involve actual "needs" rather than "wants", and most of those quickly devolve into a hot war.

The idea that Japan needs to militarily defend itself from China because of the Diaoyu dispute is quite simply ridiculous on multiple fronts. It is a pretext being paraded by Abe and his ilk to support their dreams of aggrandization.
 

SamuraiBlue

Captain
That is simply not true.

Before the nationalization of the islands, China had always proposed joint exploitation of the resources in the waters around the Diaoyu Islands. I don't know if that proposal is still on the table, but it's clear that China had always been willing to share.

The Diaoyu Islands do not have any strategic significance, aside from their economic value. They are too small to host any military installation. Neither do they affect freedom of navigation in any way, considering that they lie between Okinawa and Taiwan. Even counting the 12 nm territorial waters, there is ample room to navigate around it, if necessary. That area is wide open sea.

It is also not true that nations lay claim to a territory only when it has critical strategic importance to that nation's well being. Nations lay territorial claims for a variety of reasons, the chief of which being economic interests. There are extremely few territorial disputes that involve actual "needs" rather than "wants", and most of those quickly devolve into a hot war.

The idea that Japan needs to militarily defend itself from China because of the Diaoyu dispute is quite simply ridiculous on multiple fronts. It is a pretext being paraded by Abe and his ilk to support their dreams of aggrandization.

So is that why PRC suddenly made a claim over Uotsuri jima?
If I recall correctly PRC government authorized maps in the 50's clearly noted that the Senkaku isles were of Japanese territory and only started to make claim AFTER UN geological survey suggested that there maybe an oil field under the sea bed in the region.

As for Japan's proposal for joint exploration it was for both side of the territorial lines in which PRC kicked the table stating that they are only interested of Japan's side and have no interest in sharing their own side if I recall.
That kind of attitude will never succeed at the negotiation table.:rofl:
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Was Abe PM when Japan began defending there claim? No he was not the Japanese government has been enforcing there claim for far longer then the current PM.
the Chinese joint venture always comes with the Price that one has to recognize Chinese sovereignty.
as to being to small to be garrisoned, the Chinese have proved nothing is to small to be garrisoned.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top