Chinese Economics Thread

broadsword

Brigadier
What goes around comes around even if it does not hurt as much as US sanctions hurt Huawei and ZTE. After all, it was they who started the great wall of protectionism first using security concerns as their basis.

Huawei's sales last year was up 8.5 percent year-on-year, while Cisco's revenue dropped 3 percent and will lay off 6,000 employees.
 

Blitzo

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
A small but very meaningful step in the right direction


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Chinese coal consumption just fell for first time this century

By Justin Guay on 20 August 2014

There may be a light at the end of the long dark tunnel: It appears China’s coal boom is over.

While positive signs have been emerging from China for well over a year, it appears the ‘war on pollution‘ is not just talk. According to analysis produced by Lauri Myllyvirta and Greenpeace International in the first half of this year, China’s coal use dropped for the first time this century — while the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) actually grew.

You read that right: coal and GDP growth have decoupled in China.

At the same time, the growth of imports — the seemingly endless source of optimism for the moribund U.S. coal industry — ground almost to a halt, with only 0.9 percent growth so far this year, as opposed to more than 15 percent yearly figures we have seen since China first became a net importer. Topping off the trifecta of good news is that domestic production dropped by 1.8 percent [article is in Chinese]. While uncertainty over the changes in coal stockpiles still exists, we’re confident that the unbelievable may be at hand: peak coal consumption in China.

It’s hard to understate just how historic this shift is. Analysts have been arguing over if, and when, Chinese coal consumption would peak. Some were forecasting a peakbefore 2020 while others — including Wood Mackenzie — have been loudly claiming Chinese coal demand may not ever peak but would instead double by 2030. This new data exposes the wide gulf between reality and hype that those predictions rely on.

In a sign of just how dramatically the tables have turned on the previously skyrocketing projections for the coal industry in China, consider this: the China National Coal Association is now calling for a 10 percent reduction in second half domestic coal output in many of the main coal-producing provinces. That about face comes as quite a shock considering as recently as December, the Association was busy advocating for a billion tonnes of coal to be added to the Chinese coal market by 2020. My what a difference a year makes.

But, it’s important to understand how the many who still believe in the myth that Chinese coal demand can grow endlessly will respond to the news. Two easy to believe short-term explanations have already been offered for the slowing coal demand.

The first is that China’s economic growth is slowing and skyrocketing coal consumption will resume when the economy rebounds. The problem with this explanation is that while the first five years of the century saw coal use and GDP grow almost hand in hand, the second half saw them decouple. More importantly, the Chinese economy registered a year-on-year growth rate of 7.4 percent, which indicates that the fundamental growth pattern of the Chinese economy has changed.

The second explanation was offered by Bloomberg: a surge in hydropower generation offset coal use. China did indeed add a lot of hydropower capacity in the first half of 2014; however, the 9.7 percent year-on-year increase in hydropower generation was business-as-usual. In fact, the average for the past five years was 9.3 percent. This increase in hydropower was only capable of changing the coal consumption growth rate by less than one percentage point, which hardly changes the big picture.
So, what’s really going on? The times they are a changing, and the Chinese economy is changing with them. We’re finally starting to see movement away from the energy-intensive fossil fuel industries and investments that fueled China’s rise.

It has been long acknowledged that, in China, investments and a heavy reliance on industry cannot sustain growth while the services sector and household consumption remain suppressed. This adjustment seems to be slowly progressing, with growth in services (excluding real estate) and private consumption only recently outpacing the manufacturing industry. While still nascent, if this restructuring gains pace, along with the promising growth in clean energy, there is much reason for optimism.
But there is still a long way to go from a peak in coal consumption to the necessary reductions needed to move toward a clean energy future. Fortunately, this change does not have to be linear, and interestingly, it seems Chinese investors were ahead of the curve as many have been busy shifting their money from coal to clean energy over the past few years.

It looks like the smart money in China has long realized what the data is now showing: bullish predictions on future coal growth are unfounded, and clean energy is the future.

Source: Justin Guay is a director of the Sierra Club. Reproduced with permission.
 

ahho

Junior Member
Well Hydropower and improvement in the power grid definitely have a great effect on reduction on Coal Power plant. A lot of migrant worker and peddler stop using coal stove and to electric and gas stove. Few cities are starting to ban coal as a cooking fuel to improve air quality. I think these contributes to the causes in reduction of Coal consumption
 

delft

Brigadier
The sanctions against Russia are taking effect:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Russia’s Gazprom Neft to Sell Oil for Rubles, Yuan

12:16 27/08/2014
Tags: yuan, oil, rubles, payments, Gazprom Neft, China, Russia

MOSCOW, August 27 (RIA Novosti) - The Russian oil company Gazprom Neft has agreed to export 80,000 tons of oil from Novoportovskoye field in the Arctic; it will accept payment in rubles, and will also deliver oil via the Eastern Siberia-Pacific Ocean pipeline (ESPO), accepting payment in Chinese yuan for the transfers, the Russian business daily Kommersant reported Wednesday.

The Russian government and several of the country’s largest exporters have widely discussed the possibility of accepting payments in rubles for oil exports.

Last week, Russia began to ship oil from the Novoportovskoye field to Europe by sea. Two oil tankers are expected to arrive in Europe in September. According to Kommersant, the payment for these shipments will be received in rubles.

Gazprom Neft will not only accept payments in rubles; subsequent transfers via the ESPO may be paid for in yuan, the newspaper reported.

According to the newspaper, the change in currency was made because of the Western sanctions against Russia.

In March, in response to Crimea’s reunification with Russia, the United States and the European Union introduced a number of targeted sanctions against Russia.

As the Ukrainian crisis escalated, the United States introduced several new rounds of sanctions targeting Russia’s defense, energy and banking sectors, and persuaded its allies to blacklist several Russian citizens and companies.

As a protective measure, Russia decided to avoid making its payments in US dollars, which can be tracked and controlled by the United States government, Kommersant reported.

Gazprom Neft gained control over the Novoportovskoye field in 2012. The field’s recoverable reserves exceed 230 million tons of oil and 270 billion cubic meters of gas. It is located in the Arctic and is part of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District.
 

SamuraiBlue

Captain
Looks as if foreign investors are re-examining China;

Foreign companies in China feel targeted, survey shows

BEIJING —Foreign companies in China feel increasingly targeted for unfair enforcement of anti-monopoly and other laws and might cut investment if conditions fail to improve, a U.S. business group said Tuesday.

The American Chamber of Commerce in China’s report adds to mounting complaints about a flurry of investigations of global automakers, technology suppliers and other companies. It is a reversal for companies that welcomed plans unveiled by the ruling Communist Party in late 2013 to open the state-dominated economy to more private competition and adds to pressures at a time of slowing growth and rising competition from local rivals.

Almost half of companies that responded to a survey last week believe they are targeted for “selective and subjective enforcement” of anti-monopoly, food safety and other rules, the chamber said in a report. It said China faces a growing risk it “will permanently lose its luster as a desirable investment destination.”.... to read more
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Before saying it is just a survey, there is also the fact that FDI towards mainland China had also shrunk the past year.

Foreign Direct Investment in China Declines

BEIJING—China attracted less foreign direct investment in May compared with a year ago, according to new figures, amid concerns among some foreign investors about less-favorable operating conditions in the world's second-largest economy.

China's Ministry of Commerce said on Tuesday that foreign direct investment totaled $8.6 billion in May, down 6.7% from a year earlier and also below April's $8.7 billion figure. FDI in the first five months of the year was still up 2.8% year-over-year, at $48.91 billion.

FDI includes greenfield investment projects, such as newly built factories, as well as mergers and acquisitions. It excludes purely financial or "portfolio" investments in foreign securities. FDI can fluctuate from month to month as individual investment projects are announced.

After growing rapidly in the years leading up the global financial crisis, China's FDI growth has slowed more recently.

A survey published last month by the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China found that European companies were becoming more cautious about investing in the world's second-largest economy. Only one in five said China was their top destination for new investments, down from one in three a year earlier... to read more
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

broadsword

Brigadier
Looks as if foreign investors are re-examining China;



Before saying it is just a survey, there is also the fact that FDI towards mainland China had also shrunk the past year.

So long as there is money to be made, investors will stay, rules notwithstanding. That's the mindset of businessmen. FDI slowed because the economy slowed.
 

broadsword

Brigadier
What better way to double down on automation than to make your own robots rather than importing from elite manufacturers.

China to mass produce industrial robots

2014-09-02 18:31:55

SHENYANG, Sept. 2 (Xinhua) -- China's first industrial robot production line is expected to start operation in the northeastern city of Shenyang this month.

SIASUN Robot and Automation Co. Ltd. will be the first to jump start China's industrial robot production with an annual capacity of 5,000. Their facilities will produce robots applied in welding, hauling, assembling, stacking, grinding and polishing, according to Qu Daokui, the company's CEO.

He said the production line is undergoing tests and the exact date of operation is yet to be announced. The application of robots has expanded from the high-end industries such as automobile and electronics manufacturing to traditional industries, including metal processing, bathroom hardware, food and drinks, said Qu, who is also director general of China Robot Industry Alliance.

China became the world's largest industrial robot market in 2013 with 37,000 industrial robots sold in the country, accounting for 20 percent of the global market.

Rising labor costs and aging population have prompted the application of industrial robots in China, which at the same time boosts the intelligent transition of the manufacturing industry, said Ding Han, an academician with the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
They've always said how unattractive China is for foreign companies. Remember when they claimed that all foreign companies that have businesses in China aren't allowed to take their profits home. Then it turned out that US companies intentionally weren't taking it back to the US in order to avoid taxes. Then there's the fact that Western corporations are belt tightening because of economic concerns. They just want to spin their economic troubles as China is unattractive. Hollywood whines the most about how inhospitable China is. And what's the reason why they won't take their ball and go home then?
 
Top