manqiangrexue
Brigadier
Every country is different. Comparing those numbers is like saying that there are people who are 7 feet tall and you are only 6'4" so you must have malnutrition if you are not still growing. Every country has different levels of urbanization, different population demographics for what percent of people live in dens cities, and different levels of public transportation. Cars per person in dense cities with excellent public transportation will be much lower than in sparsely populated placed. To make it simple for people like you, everyone owns a car in Texas but maybe 1 in 3 or 4 owns a car in Manhattan and it's not because people in Manhattan are poorer.So , you saying next things:
1. Japanese poorer than Chinese, so they can not afford expensive cars.
2. Japan has more space than China.
3. China has one car / adult car ownership rate.
Just for reference, China car ownership per capita third of the EU average.
few data point :
Poland : 568 / 1000 person
Hungary : 338 / thousand person
China 164/thousand person ( 2018 data)
Urugay : 200 / thousand person
Japan:591/thousand person
Russia : 369/thousand person
South korea : 459/ thousand
South Korea population density is WAAAAY higher than China, but they still have three time as much car.
China needs to make 15 million car/year just to keep on level the vehicle stock.
With the 2017 car output number ( and as it looks like it was the highest for long time) it will take 20 years to reach Russian/Hungarian car ownership number.
No. Reread https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/chinese-economics-thread.t3715/page-957#post-534894. You clearly didn't understand. If you reread it many times and this is still your conclusion, then your English is too poor to continue. You must improve your English reading skills.So you saying that selling 1000 cars for 500 000 $ is a better sign of a middle class than selling 50 000 cars for 10 000 $ each?
Your argument centred around that the middle class getting poorer in China, but the wealthy getting richer.
Sadly, your English reading skills are too low to detect emotion in writing; unless you consider derision for stupidity an emotion... You also clearly did not understand the article you posted about pork; it says that pork is declining because diets are getting healthier. It says that right in the title and that's what I told you before. You're posting articles against your own incorrect views. I really don't understand why you're so incompetent.Sadly the data doesn't support this emotional outburst.
But pork demand has hit a ceiling, well ahead of most official forecasts. Sales of pork have now fallen for the past three years, according to data from research firm Euromonitor. Last year they hit three-year lows of 40.85 million tonnes from 42.49 million tonnes in 2014, and Euromonitor predicts they will also fall slightly in 2017.
This is Chinese consumer spending rising every year across the board, proving your belief that Chinese consumers have less money to spend is untrue:
Last edited: