Chinese Economics Thread
- Thread starter Norfolk
- Start date
Jura The idiot
General
I read:
(- Bed of jade - part of the article)
than for the rest
(- 'Very hesitant' – part of the article)
which left me with an impression the tendency to have a second child is higher for rich couples
(- Bed of jade - part of the article)
than for the rest
(- 'Very hesitant' – part of the article)
solarz
Brigadier
Rich or poor, there are a million extra babies.
Jura The idiot
General
LOL in the meantime I used google to find something obvious which was until recently the number of births had been kept (approximately) constant:
(comes from which was my top-one google-search hit, that's why I used this despite that "Exclusive content" part which just stayed there, so I put the 2015 figure on ... let's wait and see in, say, 2020)
Jura The idiot
General
now I looked at 2013 data for China:LOL in the meantime I used google to find something obvious which was until recently the number of births had been kept (approximately) constant:
(comes from which was my top-one google-search hit, that's why I used this despite that "Exclusive content" part which just stayed there, so I put the 2015 figure on ... let's wait and see in, say, 2020)
16.4 millions of births / 1357 millions of inhabitants
and this ratio is one point two per cent,
while, also 2013 for the Czech Rep.:
0.107/10.512
is one point zero per cent ... something I sure can't criticize: I have one kid LOL!
Why make more enemies? Your proposal sounds like G.W. Bush's infamous words "you are either with me or against me". That is bullying, something almost everybody in the world distain, and the outcome today has proven G.W. Bush destroyed American's world standing by doing that. Why do you want China to do just that?
No offense meant, but I suggest you to study the concept and history of "统一战线/United Front".
Last edited:
That is good.I've noticed
the construction of a big (1283.8 m long, 14.5 m wide) cable-stayed bridge over the Amur River began somewhere in yesterday, and Russians will cover two thirds of the total cost of $356m ... according to the source I quoted, which also says the construction is expected to take three years etc.
China will always stand firm economically & security wise. The Chinese will be diplomatic but will not be expected to tolerate brash/forceful actions by any country. Any inconsiderate actions will result in China's forceful reactions/retaliations. As we approach 2017 and beyond, let us hope the incoming new US Administration will negotiate wisely with China on economic and security issues. No Win-Lose BUT Win-Win outcomes for the benefit of both countries, and for Peace & Progress in World.
Amen to that Bro, peace and tolerance is what we need. Sun Tzu says avoid war at all cause as it can be drain on the treasury.
It would not surprise me if the press in the west wrote that up as a poor response to allowing more than one child in the family ......... it should be 2 or 3mill or whatever
Meanwhile why has there been an increasing surge of money leaving the country to the point of affecting her foreign reserves?
Last edited: