Chinese Economics Thread

Blackstone

Brigadier
NEVER What is this "both countries" nonsense? What the hell is Britain putting behind?
Unlike Japan, Britain isn't whitewashing history and lying to their own people about its imperial past. That is something China could work with; there's no need to grovel and mouth apologies all day long, just a few sincere ones are enough. True contrition comes from owning up to the past and educating future generations on what really happened. China and Britain could move forward in their relations because the British haven't behaved like the Japanese.
 

counterprime

New Member
Registered Member
Why you dragging Japan into this? That's a separate issue. Now, regarding these "Christian" drug dealers.

"just a few sincere ones are enough" So if someone were to say rape and kill your wife and drug your family to death, laugh at you, and spread lies about your race for over a century. Well... you will die of old age likely as a widowed drug addict, but let's say your grandchild hears some Sincere Apologies™, is all forgiven?

Why bother having a justice system? Why have prisons?

Regarding your mythology of "True contrition comes from owning up to the past and educating future generations on what really happened"...

Deny the British empire's crimes? No, we ignore them
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Finally, regarding "British haven't behaved like the Japanese"...Indeed they have not. They've been far worse.

” ..the supply of Opium to China which led to the addiction and death of countless hundreds of millions has been neglected (oh look, that dirty concept again)”

English and the Discourses of Colonialism
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Meanwhile, here's a microscopic sampling of Britain's own power to forgive
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. In case you tell me that it was a long time ago, who's helping America destroy the Middle East? Hint, it starts with "B" and it ends with "ritish".
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
One should look at history fully and in context.

At the time when the British were pushing opium on China, the full effects of it were not fully understood, and the British were using it at home themselves in everything from child cough syrup to high end smoking and injection kits aimed at the aristocracy.

It was not like they were forcing it on China while banning it at home themselves.

Indeed, it was the British who stopped shipping opium to China after they banned it at home (many many years after, but eventually they did). How else did you think China managed to finally kick the habit?

I'm by no means defending or justifying the wars of aggression Britain waged against China to sell hard drugs. Just pointing out that they were not considered hard drugs or illegal at the time.

The Imperial British committed enough terrible crimes to damn themselves without needing us to embellish any of them.

BTW, this is not something the British teach in school, in fact the whole opium war is either totally ignored or brushed over as a footnote (which is why I always roll my eyes when the British press parrots the same old lines about China being selective about what it teaches in history class) and is something I found out through independent research, so its no one's party line.

Just the historical truth as far as I can tell.
 

counterprime

New Member
Registered Member
Plawolf,

Sorry, but that is not true. Here's an excerpt in a letter to Queen Victoria from Commissioner Lin

I am told that in your own country opium smoking is forbidden under severe penalties. This means that you are aware of how harmful it is. . . . . So long as you do not take it yourselves, but continue to make it and tempt the people of China to buy it, you will be showing yourselves careful of your own lives, but careless of the lives of other people, indifferent in your greed for gain to the harm you do to others; such conduct is repugnant to human feeling and at variance with the Way of Heaven. . . . .
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
t
Plawolf,

Sorry, but that is not true. Here's an excerpt in a letter to Queen Victoria from Commissioner Lin

I could find no record of any explicit British ban on opium use until the 1926 Rolleston Act was introduced. Even that Act was a very soft control, since it only took control and distribution of opium (and other opiates derived drugs) out of the hands of pharmacists and gave it to doctors instead.

However, the Act gave doctors an almost blank cheque to proscribe opium for anything they wanted to, so wasn't really much of a control at all.

It just meant addicts had to go to their doctor to ask for a prescription rather than their pharmacist.

Before that, opium use was controlled by the pharmacists, but freely available to any and all people who wanted to buy it, and any restrictions would have more to do with licencing and taxes rather than any real worry about the health impacts on the drug.

Indeed, it is ironic that western attitudes towards opium and its derivatives only started to change and harden after the massed arrival of Chinese slave labour (in all but name) in western countries, and is, in my view, as much fuelled by racist puritanism as it is by any concern about the health implications after westerners were able to see first hand how devastating opium use and abuse can be on people.
 

Zool

Junior Member
I don't think anyone got around to posting this news about IBM. Obviously the Chinese market is one the top IT companies are keen to continue supplying:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

SAN FRANCISCO | BY
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


International Business Machines Corp said on Friday it allows certain countries to review, under strict control, portions of the U.S. technology company's product source code to detect any security flaws in its software.

China is among those countries, a person familiar with the company's policy there said. The reviews must be done using an IBM security application and the company "does not let people take the code out of the room," the source said on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter.

Without mentioning China, IBM said in a statement that "strict procedures are in place within these technology demonstration centers to ensure that no software source code is released, copied or altered in any way."

"IBM does not provide government access to client data or back doors into our technology," the company added.

The Wall Street Journal, citing two people briefed on the practice, reported earlier Friday that IBM was allowing officials from China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology to examine code.

The China ministry could not immediately be reached for comment.

The reviews would make IBM the first major U.S. tech company to comply with Beijing's recent demands for a stronger hand in foreign technology there, the Journal said.

The report did not make clear which products IBM was allowing reviews of or how long officials can spend looking at the code, and IBM did not address those issues.

China has considered its reliance on foreign technology a national security weakness, especially after former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden's revelations that U.S. spy agencies planted code in U.S.-made software to snoop on overseas targets.

Cybersecurity has been a major source of friction in U.S.-China ties, with both sides accusing the other of abuses.

IBM has been more willing to strike closer partnerships with China's government than many other U.S. tech companies, the Journal report said.

IBM said in Friday's statement that programs to review product source code are not unique to the company, citing Microsoft Corp as an example. Microsoft signed an agreement in 2003 allowing China controlled access to Windows source code, and has struck similar deals with Russia and the United Kingdom.

IBM said on Wednesday it would offer its cloud-computing platform Bluemix in China through a collaboration with Chinese data-center services company 21Vianet Group Inc.
 
Top