consumer confidence is in fact not solid, as shown by retail sales for example. On top of that there is record negative sentiment in the economy, record youth unemployment rates, youths sitting back and laying flat, and the births crisis. These things all need money and a stimulus to handle.


Youth unemployment take into account ages between 16 to 24.
I don't know you but I think kids age 16-18 should be in school not grinding their future in factory, especially as China urbanize more and if you take into account that more of them are going to vocational schools and collage, youth unemployment should be lower.
You will likely to get ban.
Again, not enough money has been directed to it. Property prices are still declining, there is still quite a lot of inventory at hand, and local governments are going bankrupt.
It's not really % that matters, but the fact that there are parts of the economy that are not doing well that need support and the fact that a stimulus is eminently doable, practical, and needed.
A economy growth could not depend on an permanent asset-financial bubble propped up central bank cheap money creating fake inflation that is eating into people savings with
housing prices so high that in 10 years young families would have to live in in expensive cartbox boxes. I think is a huge mistake that Western economies are doing.
Is simple unsustainable. In order to people in the US to afford houses again
prices have to fall way deeper and faster than China. The longer the bubble the more painful the correction has to be.
China policymakers realize that in the first housing bubble of 2014 when prices were going up pretty high that putting stimulus for keeping a bubble will only lead to a bigger bubble, as happen in 2016 and in 2018.
Propping up the bubble will lead to a more painful correction. So as long others sectors can keep up with the economy they could lead the property market to correct itself and they can stimulate in the future.
Interest all of these "free market economist" don't understand that.