Chinese Economics Thread

GulfLander

Colonel
Registered Member
Google translated
Chinese companies have completed the acquisition of Korean polarizer business, Hengmei Optoelectronics and Samsung SDI signed delivery documents | Nearly 6 billion yuan to acquire its polarizer production lines in South Korea and China, business, personnel and more than 1,000 intellectual property polarizers are known as the "chip" of optoelectronic displays. China has long relied on imports.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Wrought

Senior Member
Registered Member
Europe finally recognizing the obvious reality w.r.t. solar.

A group of French and German economists has urged Europe to identify which industries to support in the face of Chinese competition and boldly abandon those where the battle had already been lost, such as the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. The recommendations were presented in five memos to the Franco-German Council of Ministers at the request of the two governments. The memos cover trade with China, as well as defence, energy, economic growth and the labour market.

The economists advised Europe to protect sensitive sectors such as defence, space and robotics, while leaving mature industries open to cheap Chinese imports. They welcomed Chinese investment in critical technologies
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, provided that technology is shared, according to a summary published by the Franco-German Council of Economic Experts.

Jean Pisani-Ferry, a French economist and co-author of the memos, pointed to solar panels as a clear example of an industry Europe should concede. “Chinese industry is far ahead of everyone else and there’s no longer a solar panel industry in Europe,” he told French TV channel BFMTV Business last Friday. Ultimately, it’s not such a big deal because solar panels stay in place once installed. They do not create a dependence, unlike gas, which you need every day. Hence, it’s a technology in which we have to admit that we’ve lost the battle.”

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Wrought

Senior Member
Registered Member
Paper about historical supply-driven deflation, and why it's not necessarily a bad thing.

Deflation is often presumed to depress economic activity, push nominal rates to their effective lower bound, and cause financial disintermediation. We revisit 1880–1900 (one of the few periods where deflation was commonplace), assembling annual data for 12 economies and estimating a sign-restricted Bayesian panel VAR. We identify supply- and demand-driven deflation and trace effects on short-term rates and financial intermediation. Positive supply shocks lower prices and raise output without reducing nominal rates or intermediation, whereas negative demand shocks produce lower nominal rates and disintermediation. FEVDs show sizable supply contributions. Therefore, our findings suggest that policy should “look through” supply-driven deflation.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top