It's interesting how they expect a one to one relationship between gdp growth and growth in visible light seen from space. It can give a general sense of economic activity but expecting one to one is quite stupid.Found the source of the "I-can-only-see-less-China-light-from-space-with-my-broke-a$$-camera-therefore-SeeSeePee-must-be-lying-about-economy" by this dvmbfvck, i.e. Jacob Helberg:
"His husband"
View attachment 100583
In addition to all the previously mentioned issues with using light intensity to measure GDP, air quality might be an additional problem. Chinese cities used to have very poor air quality in the years on which the dataset is based. So a lot of the light emitted at night would be absorbed or scattered by particles in the air. Richer countries in which air quality was improved many decades ago are just not a good comparisonIt's interesting how they expect a one to one relationship between gdp growth and growth in visible light seen from space. It can give a general sense of economic activity but expecting one to one is quite stupid.
As a poor nation gets richer they are likely to consume more electricity for lighting but not all of it will be visible from space, such as ones used to light interior space. This doesn't take into account energy used in industry. Up to a point there won't be much increase in electricity used in lighting, especially outdoor lighting.
Light emissions are not a good measurement of economic activity. Makes little sense to take one factor and expecting it to be the same as the total goods and services output.
Using a single factor like that author, can we then say the US lied about economic growth over the last decade and half since electricity production hasn't increased? Not all economic activity have the same inputs or the same visible by products.
View attachment 100620
BEIJING : China's foreign ministry said on Tuesday that it was unaware of the situation following a market rally after social media posts circulated an unverified document that said China was forming a committee to assess border reopening in March.
"I'm not aware of the situation you mentioned," foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said in response to a question at a regular daily news conference.
Forget about the light intensity nonsense. IMF projects that China will grow 2x faster than the U.S. this year and 4x faster next year. That's all you need to know.It's interesting how they expect a one to one relationship between gdp growth and growth in visible light seen from space. It can give a general sense of economic activity but expecting one to one is quite stupid.
As a poor nation gets richer they are likely to consume more electricity for lighting but not all of it will be visible from space, such as ones used to light interior space. This doesn't take into account energy used in industry. Up to a point there won't be much increase in electricity used in lighting, especially outdoor lighting.
Light emissions are not a good measurement of economic activity. Makes little sense to take one factor and expecting it to be the same as the total goods and services output.
Using a single factor like that author, can we then say the US lied about economic growth over the last decade and half since electricity production hasn't increased? Not all economic activity have the same inputs or the same visible by products.
View attachment 100620
China's GDP is 12 trillion USD for first 9 months of this year at current USD/CNY rates. Unless Yuan radically strengthens, full year GDP on track towards 16 trillion USD (lower than 17 trillion last year).
US projected GDP for this year is 25 trillion. China still has a long way to go. Poor demographics and continuing Zero Covid isn't helping.