Chinese Economics Thread

DarkStar

Junior Member
Registered Member
That means the base salary is too low. Actually I'd like to know the salary of software engineer in Bytedance Beijing say if you have 3-5 years experience.

Around 1 million yuan for Bytedance.

Shit that's like 14 times of GDPPc of China. Translated to US that means 800K USD salary

Base salary in most high paying fields tend to be only a small fraction of total compensation. Most compensation comes in forms of bonuses, commissions, and stock grants, at least in the US.
This is by design; it ensures the salaried employee doesn't have to pay as much income tax.
 

Appix

Senior Member
Registered Member
pro market economist = ideological propaganda hack. the goal of economics should be optimizing operational efficiency. what does that have to do with ideology?

SCMP has a very neoliberal slant. No surprise that they push the word of neoliberal economists to their frontpages. Their ideal economic world is their home-city: HK. Small powerless sleeping inactive goverment while tycoons running amok with the comman man/women struggling to survive. Already forgotten how HK has been unstable the past decade in no small part due to HK economic structure. Their advice is the least what you need otherwise HK would have been something much more vital and dynamic instead of their current death spiral.
 
Last edited:

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Alibaba will donate a third of its cash reserves to social initiatives. China is going hardcore socialism.
Alibaba with its garbage R&D doesn't need so much cash reserves. Better to donate it for better purposes.

What were they going to do instead? Use it to squeeze small businesses even more? No thank you. Better for the money to go for "common prosperity"
 

Petrolicious88

Senior Member
Registered Member
Alibaba with its garbage R&D doesn't need so much cash reserves. Better to donate it for better purposes.

What were they going to do instead? Use it to squeeze small businesses even more? No thank you. Better for the money to go for "common prosperity"
Alibaba didn’t become globally competitive with garbage R&D. Good luck staying competitive when 30% of your cash is taken by the state. There goes your R&D budget.

Common Prosperity is euphemism for wealth redistribution. China went through all that before.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Alibaba didn’t become globally competitive with garbage R&D. Good luck staying competitive when 30% of your cash is taken by the state. There goes your R&D budget.
Let me explain to you what "common prosperity" means for business.

Any company who does garbage R&D (Alibaba, DiDi, Tencent et al) will all pay up through their noses to help the poor.

The rest of the REAL r&d, such Huawei, Xpeng, xiaomi, SMIC, SMEE etc wontpay anything because their business benefit China's technological independence.

If Alibaba et al, want to continue with their useless R&D, no problem, they will just keep paying for "common prosperity"
 
Top