At least one current member of the nuclear club play s actually semantics with the real substance of her arsenal:
Israel. Officially Israel
will not be the first to introduce nuclear weapons in the middle east, whatever that kind of talmudic wordmingling really means is subjected to everyones interpretation. Although about one fact there is absolutely no second guessing in Tehran, Cairo, Riyadh and even Islamabad: Israel´s Zahal will be able to incinerate every population center in their respective countries within 30 minutes if an israeli prime minister should ever give order to do so. Israel´s arsenal of more than 200 weapons is simply to massive for being ambiguous.
Also Pakistan in the early phase of her nuclear deterrent (1987-1997) and South Africa throughout the entire existence (1982-1990) of hers remained at least ambiguous about their nuclear capability but obviously both countries achieved the degree of deterrance effect they perceived neccessary.
As for your comment dear oringo:
Perhaps there is a level of deterrence invisible for the public or even informed professional and academic circles. Only very few people in the highest echelons of military and intelligence (
and this only in major powers) are probably in the know what indeed genocidal effect new biogenetic weapons may have if the situation of total war between major powers like the US, China and Russia ever occurs. The fact that a global conflict between major powers cannot be won by one side is obviously not only dependent on nuclear weapons but also on carefully hidden arsenals of mass destruction (
bioweapons and other dreadful gadgets). Deterrence works for a small highly priviledged group of elites, for informed circles (military, academia) and for the broad public in the same way:
they must know what they need to know. In essence this fact is the cause why Armageddon has not come for 61 years and will hopefully stay away in our century too.