Blackstone
Brigadier
Are their AESA development better than their jet engine development?I can't really provide any sort of comprehensive summary at all, because there are too many gaps in knowledge to make it worthwhile.
Are their AESA development better than their jet engine development?I can't really provide any sort of comprehensive summary at all, because there are too many gaps in knowledge to make it worthwhile.
I can't really provide any sort of comprehensive summary at all, because there are too many gaps in knowledge to make it worthwhile.
@Deino can you please share some thing regarding the above request
Are their AESA development better than their jet engine development?
New AESA radar from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)
View attachment 36256
View attachment 36257
Ummm... where did you get that idea?
First of all the Chinese Academy of Sciences is the national academy of sciences for China. For CAS to come out with something as middling as a fighter AESA would be silly. That would be expected for a specific defence/science institute with a given number, but not ascribed to the CAS as a whole.
More importantly -- read the sign itself. It is the National Chung Shan Institute of Science and Technology; NCSIST, which is the primary R&D institute for the ministry of national defence for ROC/Taiwan!!!
..........
You're right; this is a Taiwanese AESA.
My bad; disregard the previous post.
Also, the signs are in traditional.You're right; this is a Taiwanese AESA.
My bad; disregard the previous post.