I do wonder if they'll test the Lunar module and/or propulsion module in Low Earth orbit (launched by CZ-5 or CZ-10A), this could enable tests of Lanyue before the CZ-10,
If we look back at Chang'e program, the 7500N landing engine was used on the first landing without LEO test, only static test. It has never made any problems. LEO test may speed up things a little bit, but from China's track record, existing ground testing regime is probably adquate.
after all both Apollo and the L3 program had LEO lander tests. It may also be worth remembering that the Propulsion module uses the entirely new YF-58 Staged combustion hypergolic engine, I'd be surprised if it is first flown in the uncrewed lunar landing test.
If you are talking about Apollo-9, that was a crewed test with Saturn V (corresponding to CZ-10). That mission included many things, not only the propulsion of LM, but docking which is a great challenge at the time. They did it in LEO most likely because of the concern of crew safety, it was easier to return to the ground because the CM is nearby. They had to do it with crew because of lack of automation. If they had the computer power of today they may do it in LLO to speed up things, remember Apollo-10 did just that (LM deceleration from LLO without landing).
Today China has done many times of automated LLO docking, descent, ascent and return in Chang'e program. For China doing a LLO test of lander propulsion module/YF-58 test is not much different from LEO due to automation. LLO test will be more accurate to reality because of the right gravity and no-air. The failure of LLO test will still give more knowledge than a failed LEO test.
In short USA and USSR did those tests because there were no capable automation back then, not really a necessity today.