China's Space Program Thread II

TheRathalos

Just Hatched
Registered Member
It seems Landspace still aimed for a September Zhuque-3 launch as of 2 weeks ago....

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(Jul 9 conference)

First of all, to answer the first question, we successfully completed the test run of the first stage power system of the Zhuque-3 carrier rocket on June 20. The overall effect is still very good, no matter how it flies in the sky or how it is tested on the ground. At present, we are still aiming at the goal of completing the first flight on September 30. Now, both production and the overall technical closed loop are being promoted in full swing.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
IMO, a colleague(Ex-ZTE engineer now working at a space firm) of mine I was talking to the other day about this project seems rather unimpressed with this project technologically. Said that the reason these satellites fly that high is due to using similar tech that Beidou satellites use for communication which is less efficient/advanced than Starlink.
Don't believe him simply because he used to work in ZTE. Was he a radio and baseband R&D engineer? Or just someone climbing towers and connecting cables? Tell you a fact, more than half of the engineers in this industry knows almost nothing about the details because that is not their job. Making a connection to Beidou network tells me that he is one of the unkowning with a oversized mouth.

Beidou's communication is far different and therefor unrelated to any kind of broadband communication. Beidou is advanced and efficient in its own communication application, that is short messaging. Such tech is not part of broadband package switching.

His claim that less efficient communication scheme leads to higher orbit is self-defeating argument becuase such scheme (modulation etc.) would demand lower orbit to compansate lower S/N resulted from the scheme. Speaking reversely higher orbit means better tech because UE can reliably recieve weaker signals from a longer distance, and has better satellite coverage.
 
Last edited:

Tomboy

Junior Member
Registered Member
Don't believe him simply because he used to work in ZTE. Was he a radio and baseband R&D engineer? Or just someone climbing towers and connecting cables? Tell you a fact, more than half of the engineers in this industry knows almost nothing about the details because that is not their job. Making a connection to Beidou network tells me that he is one of the unkowning with a oversized mouth.

Beidou's communication is far different and therefor unrelated to any kind of broadband communication. Beidou is advanced and efficient in its own communication application, that is short messaging. Such tech is not part of broadband package switching.

His claim that less efficient communication scheme leads to higher orbit is self-defeating argument becuase such scheme (modulation etc.) would demand lower orbit to compansate lower S/N resulted from the scheme. Speaking reversely higher orbit means better tech because UE can reliably recieve weaker signals from a longer distance, and has better satellite coverage.
He was a senior RF engineer at ZTE and now working on spacecraft communication systems so I'd say he knows what he is doing. I'm pretty sure he did not refer to SNR as a issue but just said "is similar to how the Beidou system worked" and that he doesn't highly of this project and considering this is a lunch time discussion I understandably didn't bother pressing for more details.
 

nativechicken

Junior Member
Registered Member
He was a senior RF engineer at ZTE and now working on spacecraft communication systems so I'd say he knows what he is doing. I'm pretty sure he did not refer to SNR as a issue but just said "is similar to how the Beidou system worked" and that he doesn't highly of this project and considering this is a lunch time discussion I understandably didn't bother pressing for more details.

If you have read various literature related to low orbit communication giant constellations in the Chinese literature database.
I highly doubt the viewpoint of your colleague.
Perhaps he is referring to the issue of frequency bands, as China uses frequencies much higher than the Ku/KA frequency band. This is the real weakness.
 

by78

General
High-resolution images from the launch of the 5th batch of Guowang/China Satnet satellites (also known as Xingwang, Chuangxin-20, CX-20, WHWD, Guangwang, China Sat, so on and on and on and on). The launch was carried out by a Long March 6A rocket. This marks the 585th flight of the Long March series.

P.S. Expect them to add more monikers and nicknames to the constellation in the near future. There seems to be an inverse relationship between the number of names a project has and its track record of success.

54682159351_0abbb1597c_k.jpg
54682388448_2fdeb29929_k.jpg
54682388513_c42d6c4164_k.jpg

54682391944_3d3fa97857_k.jpg

54682487465_93480bcb90_k.jpg
 
Top