China's Space Program Thread II

Maikeru

Major
Registered Member
Once again, there is no place for "look funny, or look nice" in science and technology.

Solid booster's diameter determines burn time, length determins thrust. It's is determined by technical reasons (number of stages, thrust/mass ratio, payload mass etc.) and can not be changed to look "nice".
Surely the other way around? length = burn time, diameter = thrust?
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
Surely the other way around? length = burn time, diameter = thrust?
No.

The fuel is burnt through an internal specially shapped chamber all the way from the bottom to the top, the longer it is the more combustion the more thrust.

The fuel is burnt at the surface of that internal chamber outwardly, therefor the larger diameter the longer time it burns.

See the illustration
1705251770222.png
 

no_name

Colonel
No.

The fuel is burnt through an internal specially shapped chamber all the way from the bottom to the top, the longer it is the more combustion the more thrust.

The fuel is burnt at the surface of that internal chamber outwardly, therefor the larger diameter the longer time it burns.

See the illustration
View attachment 123878
So roughly like a gun barrel then the longer the length the more acceleration at the end.
You can somewhat alter the burn time/profile by using different internal chamber cross sections, like star instead of circular to have more surface area, etc.
 

gpt

Junior Member
Registered Member
Interesting piece from 2018
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
1705334169665.png
Gaofen-11s apparently have a 8-10cm resolution (think US Keyhole) and there is now 4 of them
These as well as future LEO and VLEO imaging sats likely can 'coordinate' with geosynchronous ones by receiving data from them and then quickly maneuvering over an area of interest to get a better shot

1705334470836.png


I don't have a 0.1m resolution image lol but its clearer than this (taken from an ESA Sentinel-2)


1705334748534.png
 
Top