guess every coin has two sides,still it’s good to have internal competition.Correction, I misplaced the I in the names. It should have been academy instead of institute. It should have been:
CASIC, China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation.
CASC, China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation.
Some of us dont speak chinese, is there a summary/translation of what china is rejecting?
According to guanchazhe, US didn't get rejected due to policy, rather their proposal did not meet China's standard for scientific rigour.
According to guanchazhe, US didn't get rejected due to policy, rather their proposal did not meet China's standard for scientific rigour.
No, that article does not have any further detail on what the US proposal was.Some of us dont speak chinese, is there a summary/translation of what china is rejecting?